Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=264355
...just tell us what happenedAnonymous User wrote:Are there any signs either from the clerks or judge that are indicators of a bad interview?
ronanOgara wrote:...just tell us what happenedAnonymous User wrote:Are there any signs either from the clerks or judge that are indicators of a bad interview?
Are you OP? Did you send your writing sample in before or after you scheduled your interview?Anonymous User wrote:Well I had a judge tell me my writing sample had several typos so there's that.
no wonder you only got 3Hs (even with the ever declining standards in admissions).wwwcol wrote:You mean other than normal body language cues and attempts to change topic/fill space? They aren't going to say "that was a bad interview." You'll just get a rejection email/letter/call some time later. And that letter/call/email is a decent indicator of a bad interview.
I almost wrote this but wasn't feeling sufficiently mean. OP: Can you really not understand why your question is impossible to answer in the abstract?JusticeJackson wrote:If they left you with the impression that you should ask anonymous strangers on the internet if you had a bad interview, then that's a pretty good sign that you had a bad interview.Anonymous User wrote:Are there any signs either from the clerks or judge that are indicators of a bad interview?
Anonymous User wrote: but there must be a few things that are common to most of them.
No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?
Yep, there's a reason why you're not the one with the feeder interview. But keep trolling online if it makes you feel better.rpupkin wrote:No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?
Damn, I just got owned by a super-prestigious anon.Anonymous User wrote:Yep, there's a reason why you're not the one with the feeder interview. But keep trolling online if it makes you feel better.rpupkin wrote:No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?
I'm always amused by folks who tout their accomplishments over others without knowing what the other person's resume is like.Anonymous User wrote:Yep, there's a reason why you're not the one with the feeder interview. But keep trolling online if it makes you feel better.rpupkin wrote:No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?
Anonymous User wrote:Yep, there's a reason why you're not the one with the feeder interview. But keep trolling online if it makes you feel better.rpupkin wrote:No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?
I love TLS sometimesHaha agreed.JusticeJackson wrote:I'm amused that getting a probably unsuccessful interview with a feeder judge is now an accomplishment. What resume section does that go under?emkay625 wrote: I'm always amused by folks who tout their accomplishments over others without knowing what the other person's resume is like.
I think it falls under "Interests."JusticeJackson wrote:I'm amused that getting a probably unsuccessful interview with a feeder judge is now an accomplishment. What resume section does that go under?emkay625 wrote: I'm always amused by folks who tout their accomplishments over others without knowing what the other person's resume is like.
Jesus christ, dude.lats19nys wrote:Yep, there's a reason why you're not the one with the feeder interview. But keep trolling online if it makes you feel better.rpupkin wrote:No, not complicated--just reflective of a lack of basic common sense. But keep shaking your head.Anonymous User wrote:What I was looking for were understood hints that an interviewee should have recognized to have been indicative of a less than stellar interview. It wasn't because the interview went clearly badly or seemed anything out of the ordinary. I was just trying to best gauge my experience based on small things like that that other people had experienced or recognized. Smh. Was that really that complicated?