Page 1 of 1
Will I have a clerkship in September? (sequestration)
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:12 am
by DreamingInDigital
I am set to begin a COA clerkship in September 2013. Will the clerkship be affected by the sequestration/budget cuts that are set to take effect today?
Re: Will I have a clerkship in September? (sequestration)
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:18 am
by Anonymous User
DreamingInDigital wrote:I am set to begin a COA clerkship in September 2013. Will the clerkship be affected by the sequestration/budget cuts that are set to take effect today?
It shouldn't be. See the sequestration thread further down on the board.
Re: Will I have a clerkship in September? (sequestration)
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:19 am
by DreamingInDigital
Anonymous User wrote:DreamingInDigital wrote:I am set to begin a COA clerkship in September 2013. Will the clerkship be affected by the sequestration/budget cuts that are set to take effect today?
It shouldn't be. See the sequestration thread further down on the board.
Thank you - I will take a look at that thread. I haven't called chambers yet, but I have a feeling that the JA won't know anything.
Re: Will I have a clerkship in September? (sequestration)
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:52 am
by A. Nony Mouse
I said this in the other thread, but in case it's helpful, I was told chambers staff are essential personnel and therefore the sequestration has no effect. I'm in a district court, but I can't imagine COA is any different. Also, following the info from the other thread, it looks like most agencies are furloughing people rather than firing people (though I can't say that's universal).
Re: Will I have a clerkship in September? (sequestration)
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:59 am
by DreamingInDigital
A. Nony Mouse wrote:I said this in the other thread, but in case it's helpful, I was told chambers staff are essential personnel and therefore the sequestration has no effect. I'm in a district court, but I can't imagine COA is any different. Also, following the info from the other thread, it looks like most agencies are furloughing people rather than firing people (though I can't say that's universal).
Thanks. Seems like the federal judiciary has been an afterthought in most discussions of the sequestration.