Property Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
lawlskoolz

New
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:45 pm

Property

Post by lawlskoolz » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:26 pm

I'm relying on and using a property supplement from 2010. Did any major aspects of Property Law for a 1L class change at all from 2010-2014 that using a 2010 supplement is a bad idea? I'm using that edition because it is the only edition keyed to my 2014 textbook on Property Law. But is it going to be outdated?

For example, I know that for a course like Civil Procedure it's always best to have the updated versions of every book since the law changes year to year.

Would appreciate the help.

User avatar
Micdiddy

Gold
Posts: 2231
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm

Re: Property

Post by Micdiddy » Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:15 pm

Ask your professor.

User avatar
BVest

Platinum
Posts: 7887
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Property

Post by BVest » Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:39 pm

If it's keyed to your casebook then you should have little problem recognizing any differences. If your casebook has a case after 2009, be sure to look closely at it.

ETA, I can't think of a ton of super-recent cases. If there are some, they're probably in the areas of implied warranty of suitability or division of compensation for condemnation on commercial leases, or something else like that, which you're probably not likely to get deep into in a 1-semester property course. (If you cover the Davidow case, the Italian Cowboy case might be in the notes after).
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Property

Post by Tiago Splitter » Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:58 pm

2010? Other than IP I don't think many property law concepts have changed much since 1910.

bdm261

Bronze
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:19 am

Re: Property

Post by bdm261 » Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:32 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:2010? Other than IP I don't think many property law concepts have changed much since 1910.
More like 1066.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Property

Post by jbagelboy » Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:51 am

Tiago Splitter wrote:2010? Other than IP I don't think many property law concepts have changed much since 1910.
That takings clause & zoning jurisprudence doe. If you do the pseudo-con law stuff in your class it'll be on the exam and there might be recent, relevant case law. Otherwise yea, the Sprankling supplement is great and fee simple has been a fee simple for just about ever.

User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: Property

Post by pancakes3 » Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:47 am

Any particular reason you're relying so heavily on the supp rather than notes/casebook?

User avatar
MarkfromWI

Bronze
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 4:54 pm

Re: Property

Post by MarkfromWI » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:44 am

pancakes3 wrote:Any particular reason you're relying so heavily on the supp rather than notes/casebook?
Because it's a better way to learn than digging through an 8-10 page opinion for two lines of text or listening to confused classmates trying to figure out a life estate with a contingent remainder.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”