intent for assault
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 10:45 am
Hi guys,
It's me again. I hope you dont mind another stupid question from me, but I am confused and need to ask.
I dont understand the intent part for the tort of assault. does the defendant have to intend to cause an apprehension of harmful contact, or the mere fact that the plaintiff experienced an apprehension of harmful contact is enough?
I will give you an extreme example to illustrate where I am confused. let's say there is a country where they point a gun to someone's head to say "happy birthday"
it's my birthday today and a person from that country points a gun to my head. he did not mean to cause an apprehension, he was just saying happy birthday. Has that person committed the tort of assault?
It's me again. I hope you dont mind another stupid question from me, but I am confused and need to ask.
I dont understand the intent part for the tort of assault. does the defendant have to intend to cause an apprehension of harmful contact, or the mere fact that the plaintiff experienced an apprehension of harmful contact is enough?
I will give you an extreme example to illustrate where I am confused. let's say there is a country where they point a gun to someone's head to say "happy birthday"
it's my birthday today and a person from that country points a gun to my head. he did not mean to cause an apprehension, he was just saying happy birthday. Has that person committed the tort of assault?