NEW RANKINGS ARE OUT!
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:04 am
School rankings are out for the 2014 year!
Post opinions!!!
Post opinions!!!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=225982
uh no. That's not at all like UT students saying they go to a T14. Since US News has been ranking law schools, Texas was in the T14 for 1 year. From the 2000s to 2009, Duke was in the top 10.fish52 wrote:Cue all of the Duke Law students saying they go to a "T10." Like the UTexas students that still claim they go to a "T14."
They popped into the T14 in 2011. It's the only year they dipped in. (it's the only school to get into the T14 that hasn't previously been a "Top 10" school actually. Ever other T14 has been in the T10 at some point in time, i believe)CourCour wrote:When was UTexas in the T14?
Arpedzio wrote:FSU up to 45. I'm liking these ranking things until next year when we're back down to 50 something.

(Duke Law Student)mr.hands wrote:uh no. That's not at all like UT students saying they go to a T14. Since US News has been ranking law schools, Texas was in the T14 for 1 year. From the 2000s to 2009, Duke was in the top 10.fish52 wrote:Cue all of the Duke Law students saying they go to a "T10." Like the UTexas students that still claim they go to a "T14."
The T10 distinction is also a stupid one. It's not remotely as meaningful as the T14 distinction. So there's that
And the worst part is, they don't even sell magazines anymore.fish52 wrote:
But really, my point is that the movement in the rankings is artificial, drummed up by USNWR to sell magazines.
Yeah that's not what you said. Don't moderate your argument after you're called out. Also, if i were a Duke Law student (which i'm not) i wouldn't say that the T10 distinction was meaningless. I would play it up.fish52 wrote: But really, my point is that the movement in the rankings is artificial, drummed up by USNWR to sell magazines.