Freaking out about my upcoming closed book crim exam
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:23 am
So I have about a week until my criminal law exam and this will be the first closed book exam and right now I am almost 100% sure I am going to fail or near fail.
Basically I was told a few weeks ago that this prof cares about only the cases and tests on only the cases. At the beginning of the class I checked out his old exams and most of them did involve a question about some jurisdiction usually in some early 1900s period, but a few of his involved solely general common law questions or MPC questions.
I spent most of the quarter doing the case readings, but I only read them once through unless I didn't understand the analysis, copied some brief off the web into my notes, and consulted supplements if I wasn't sure about the BLL.
Now I have made flashcards for all of the cases, and have all the BLL outlined, and its becoming very apparent that I cannot recall jack shit from memory. We have covered over 100 cases and right now I can only recall about 3 from memory where I know the facts/holding/jurisdiction/year. I don't know how I can possibly memorize 100 in addition to memorizing the BLL.
I understand fully the broad picture of the law; the general elements of everything in the course, but I cannot possibly recite each element accurately - only in the general sense. The prof for this course is also a complete prick who seems to take some sadistic pleasure in making the class as obtuse as possible. His only advice: the more you know, the better. He may make the entire test based on some obscure note after a case that identified some exception to the general rule. The only thing I know is that the test will not be the traditional issue spotter.
Does anyone have any advice that would be useful at this point? I didn't work my ass off but I didn't slack on the material either but it seems as if the only way I would have been prepared is if I had put in 3-4 hours per day on this class alone the entire quarter.
Basically I was told a few weeks ago that this prof cares about only the cases and tests on only the cases. At the beginning of the class I checked out his old exams and most of them did involve a question about some jurisdiction usually in some early 1900s period, but a few of his involved solely general common law questions or MPC questions.
I spent most of the quarter doing the case readings, but I only read them once through unless I didn't understand the analysis, copied some brief off the web into my notes, and consulted supplements if I wasn't sure about the BLL.
Now I have made flashcards for all of the cases, and have all the BLL outlined, and its becoming very apparent that I cannot recall jack shit from memory. We have covered over 100 cases and right now I can only recall about 3 from memory where I know the facts/holding/jurisdiction/year. I don't know how I can possibly memorize 100 in addition to memorizing the BLL.
I understand fully the broad picture of the law; the general elements of everything in the course, but I cannot possibly recite each element accurately - only in the general sense. The prof for this course is also a complete prick who seems to take some sadistic pleasure in making the class as obtuse as possible. His only advice: the more you know, the better. He may make the entire test based on some obscure note after a case that identified some exception to the general rule. The only thing I know is that the test will not be the traditional issue spotter.
Does anyone have any advice that would be useful at this point? I didn't work my ass off but I didn't slack on the material either but it seems as if the only way I would have been prepared is if I had put in 3-4 hours per day on this class alone the entire quarter.