Top Law Schools

Does anyone know if there is a big difference between the 3rd and 4th edition of this supplement? was thinking of buying the 3rd edition, but not sure if thats the best idea.

SKlei wrote:Does anyone know if there is a big difference between the 3rd and 4th edition of this supplement? was thinking of buying the 3rd edition, but not sure if thats the best idea.

3rd is fine.

3rd is fine. Off the top of my head, you'll only be missing complete info on a couple of habeas cases.

I'd imagine you'd miss the Sebellius case, which your class would probably cover, but you could simply get that case off Westlaw or LexisNexis.

waxecstatic wrote:I'd imagine you'd miss the Sebellius case, which your class would probably cover, but you could simply get that case off Westlaw or LexisNexis.

NFIB v. Sebelius isn't in the 4th edition either since it came out in 2011.

This is seriously much better than Chemerinsky:

http://www.amazon.com/Sum-Substance-Aud ... supplement

I know it's sacrilegious to say something like this, but Chemerinsky is way more than you need.

I have both and I know the standing section is different because recent cases have changed the analysis

This is seriously much better than Chemerinsky:

--LinkRemoved-- ... supplement

I know it's sacrilegious to say something like this, but Chemerinsky is way more than you need.

Agreed to a certain extent-I used these to supplement my outline, but I also used Chemerinsky for the same purpose. You don't need to read Chemerinsky straight through or anything. Instead, just go look up where he discusses the cases and make sure you have the important points he makes in your outline. Also, our Con Law exam was open book, so I tabbed up Chemerinsky and referred to it a couple times during the exam.