Poor souls in quarter-system schools.crumpetsandtea wrote:How the fuck are y'all STILL doing finals???? Holy shit guys.
OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS) Forum
- BlueLotus
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:07 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
not for long!
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
Last final today! After that is done I give you all permission to begin summer.
I suppose if the Stanford people haven't finished yet we can wait for them too, but I won't be happy about it.
I suppose if the Stanford people haven't finished yet we can wait for them too, but I won't be happy about it.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
- Jsa725
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Sun Oct 26, 2014 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
Summer may now commence, we are 2Ls
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
The 2L thread just title changed to 3L thread. We can probably do the same thing if our OP is around. Otherwise, someone who is not me can make.2014 wrote:Summer may now commence, we are 2Ls
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
This thread should burn in hell, we deserve a fresh start.
Just one guys opinion though
E- Just saw it was created
Just one guys opinion though
E- Just saw it was created
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:29 pm
Property Law Easement please help
Ravaj owns all the land egularly takes a stroll from her home across a worn path to the lake where she canoes, fishes, and dangles her feet in the water. When she takes a new job downtown in Big City where she lives she sells the home and lot labeled Uplands and Development above to Sonya, a local developer. She keeps the land labeled Riparian area for herself. The deed makes no mention of the lakefront lot but after the property sale was completed, Sonya told her she could come fish anytime she liked.
1. If Ravaj come back the weekend after she sells the property and walks across the area labeled Development to go fish in the lake what is her best defense to a claim of trespass brought against her by Sonya.
A. She has a profit a prendre to fish in the lake.
B. She has an easement by necessity to reach the lakefront lot.
C. She has an easement by estoppel to reach the lakefront lot.
D. She has an express right of way under the statute of frauds.
2. If the jurisdiction has a 7 year adverse possession statute and Ravaj continues to come to the lakefront property every weekend for the 7 year period then what would result?
A. She would obtain an easement by prescription over Sonya’s land.
B. She would not obtain an easement by prescription because Sonya granted her permission to cross her property.
C. She would obtain a profit a prendre to fish in the lake by prescription.
D. None of the above.
3. If Sonya puts a chain link fence up that blocks Ravaj’s access for 6 years and then Ravay cuts a hole in the fence and regularly passes through thereafter what would result?
A. Nothing, because a fence cannot affect the property rights of either party.
B. Sonya can successfully sue Ravaj for trespass since she prevented her from obtaining a prescriptive easement.
C. Sonya cannot sue Ravaj successfully for trespass since she her easement remains intact.
D. Sonya cannot sue Ravaj successfully for trespass because the fence was in violation of Ravaj’s profit a prendre to take fish from the lake.
4. Sonya begins using the path to walk down to the lake across the lakefront lot and Ravaj finds out a few months later and tells Sonya to stop crossing the lot to the lake. If Sonya continues and Ravaj brings a suit against her in trespass what would result?
A. Ravaj will prevail but only if she told Sonya after the sale that she could not use the path.
B. Ravaj will prevail regardless of what she told Sonya after the sale.
C. Sonya will prevail but only if Ravaj told her after the sale that she could use the path.
D. Sonya will prevail regardless of what Ravaj told her after the sale.
5. Ravaj records a restriction against the development of the lakefront lot so that “Sonya and any co-occupants that she has can enjoy the view of the lake.” The restriction is duly recorded in both the deed she retains and the deed provided to Sonya. Ten years later Sonya sells the house and the property labeled Development and Uplands in the diagram above to Carlos and Ravaj sells the lakefront lot to Darryl. If Darryl builds a 2 story cabin on the lake that blocks the view of the lake from the house and Carlos sues for breach of the restrictive covenant what would result.
A. Carlos will lose since the covenant did not run with the land.
B. Carlos will lose since the covenant did not touch and concern the land.
C. Darryl will win since the covenant was in writing.
D. Darryl will win since the covenant ran with the land.
1. If Ravaj come back the weekend after she sells the property and walks across the area labeled Development to go fish in the lake what is her best defense to a claim of trespass brought against her by Sonya.
A. She has a profit a prendre to fish in the lake.
B. She has an easement by necessity to reach the lakefront lot.
C. She has an easement by estoppel to reach the lakefront lot.
D. She has an express right of way under the statute of frauds.
2. If the jurisdiction has a 7 year adverse possession statute and Ravaj continues to come to the lakefront property every weekend for the 7 year period then what would result?
A. She would obtain an easement by prescription over Sonya’s land.
B. She would not obtain an easement by prescription because Sonya granted her permission to cross her property.
C. She would obtain a profit a prendre to fish in the lake by prescription.
D. None of the above.
3. If Sonya puts a chain link fence up that blocks Ravaj’s access for 6 years and then Ravay cuts a hole in the fence and regularly passes through thereafter what would result?
A. Nothing, because a fence cannot affect the property rights of either party.
B. Sonya can successfully sue Ravaj for trespass since she prevented her from obtaining a prescriptive easement.
C. Sonya cannot sue Ravaj successfully for trespass since she her easement remains intact.
D. Sonya cannot sue Ravaj successfully for trespass because the fence was in violation of Ravaj’s profit a prendre to take fish from the lake.
4. Sonya begins using the path to walk down to the lake across the lakefront lot and Ravaj finds out a few months later and tells Sonya to stop crossing the lot to the lake. If Sonya continues and Ravaj brings a suit against her in trespass what would result?
A. Ravaj will prevail but only if she told Sonya after the sale that she could not use the path.
B. Ravaj will prevail regardless of what she told Sonya after the sale.
C. Sonya will prevail but only if Ravaj told her after the sale that she could use the path.
D. Sonya will prevail regardless of what Ravaj told her after the sale.
5. Ravaj records a restriction against the development of the lakefront lot so that “Sonya and any co-occupants that she has can enjoy the view of the lake.” The restriction is duly recorded in both the deed she retains and the deed provided to Sonya. Ten years later Sonya sells the house and the property labeled Development and Uplands in the diagram above to Carlos and Ravaj sells the lakefront lot to Darryl. If Darryl builds a 2 story cabin on the lake that blocks the view of the lake from the house and Carlos sues for breach of the restrictive covenant what would result.
A. Carlos will lose since the covenant did not run with the land.
B. Carlos will lose since the covenant did not touch and concern the land.
C. Darryl will win since the covenant was in writing.
D. Darryl will win since the covenant ran with the land.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:00 pm
Re: OFFICIAL 1L Exam Prep & Motivation Thread (CSWS)
I'm not going to check to see if any of these have been posted for this years batch of 1Ls. I hope these help ya'll and your first round of exams.
The best resource to "get" UCC 2-207.
Estates and Future Interests.
Civ Pro Timeline.
The best resource to "get" UCC 2-207.
Estates and Future Interests.
Civ Pro Timeline.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login