Page 1 of 1
Securities 1933 or Bankruptcy as a 3L
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 1:35 pm
by beach_terror
...
Re: Securities 1933 or Bankruptcy as a 3L
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 7:10 pm
by imchuckbass58
Securities will probably be somewhat more useful, but in my opinion is much more boring. Bankruptcy is slightly less useful (though still relevant), but was one of the best classes I took in law school.
Re: Securities 1933 or Bankruptcy as a 3L
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 9:58 pm
by geekrocker37
beach_terror wrote:Pretty simple - I'm a rising 3L and am debating between Securities Act of 1933 and Bankruptcy. General interest in learning more about financial stuff but have no real background in it. Good chance I'm going in-house post-grad, if that influences anything. Not enough credits for both.
Edit: reasons are helpful
I took Bankruptcy, and seriously no one can follow Taggert. That being said, it is incredibly practical right now in my firm. See if you come across any in House stuff dealing with your company as a creditor. If not, probably won't need it in house.
If O'Hare teaches Securities Act, she is pretty great. Killed Biz Orgs with her.
Re: Securities 1933 or Bankruptcy as a 3L
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 8:55 am
by beach_terror
...