i'm going to round up to maybe 30f7u12 wrote: except maybe 15-20 people really piss me off.
Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck Forum
- Guchster
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
- Guchster
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
EdHoover wrote:So do not think less of me if I do not measure up to your metrics of success: "If I'm not so large as you,/You are not so small as I,/And not half so spry. . . Talents differ; [but] all is well and wisely put."
Dafuq did I just read?!
This is a pretty decent troll.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
EdHoover wrote:Oh, Magnifencent. You could not be more wrong. There is no way I could lose at this game: no one ever loses. But no one ever wins either, not entirely at any rate. We all ultimately end up in some indeterminate state between success and failure, as winners in some respects and failures in others. So do not think less of me if I do not measure up to your metrics of success: "If I'm not so large as you,/You are not so small as I,/And not half so spry. . . Talents differ; [but] all is well and wisely put."Magnificent wrote:It sounds like most of the people crying about Columbia are those that lost the law school game.
Now, after reading this you are probably thinking, "Yeah, whatever. Law school didn't work out for this dude and he's now trying to rationalize his defeat." Again, you could not be more wrong. I didn't say that I don't measure up to your standards; all I said was that, were it the case that I didn't measure up, you still wouldn't have sufficient reason to mock me.
You should have been an English teacher
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- girlmonster
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 10:46 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
I don't know how I found this thread. But now I'm scared.
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
what ever happened to Magnificent? crushing it with his solo SCOTUS appellate practice yet?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Columbia administration is meh at best and has been ritualistically disappointing - I'll grant OP so much - but the students are fine. The person who said Duke, UVA, Chicago, Michigan, Harvard ect have better QoL, nah, lol, unless you like small towns and bars that close early. At Columbia, the campus is gorgeous; the neighborhood pleasant with relatively easy access to more traditional city fun a few stops on the 1; people are friendly for the most part and interesting/accomplished - they take their shit seriously (sometimes too seriously), but that's why we are here; there's a ton of intellectually or professionally engaging activities, free food and ways to get involved, such as lunch talks, pro bono in the city, ect. And most importantly, people get great jobs, and in large numbers. The flaws (and of course, there are many) are surely more symptomatic of law school as a whole, and not this law school. Law school as an institution, as a concept, is pretty horrible. It's MO is to suck. Columbia is so much better than most.
ETA: we also have our share of wonderful brilliant profs, and terrible useless ones, and just total assholes. Maybe CLS attracts mildly more asshole profs than some schools, but most law professors across the discipline and the academy are problematic
ETA: we also have our share of wonderful brilliant profs, and terrible useless ones, and just total assholes. Maybe CLS attracts mildly more asshole profs than some schools, but most law professors across the discipline and the academy are problematic
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 1:26 am
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
OP is pretty epic, I clapped my hands reading the first page. He ran circles around his classmates
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
I'm actually thinking, "I bet this guy is super weird in person."EdHoover wrote: Now, after reading this you are probably thinking, "Yeah, whatever. Law school didn't work out for this dude and he's now trying to rationalize his defeat." Again, you could not be more wrong. I didn't say that I don't measure up to your standards; all I said was that, were it the case that I didn't measure up, you still wouldn't have sufficient reason to mock me.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
I sat down to write my "Fuck CLS" list but I couldn't come up with more than professors are assholes (true anywhere), the administration sucks (probably also true anywhere), and everything is way too fucking expensive (welcome to New York). It really doesn't make anything worse than a competitive law school has to be--if you're not happy here, you wouldn't be happy at Chicago, or Penn, or UVA, or Duke. The whole "CLS is uniquely full of cutthroat gunners" thing is absolute horseshit.jbagelboy wrote:Columbia administration is meh at best and has been ritualistically disappointing - I'll grant OP so much - but the students are fine. The person who said Duke, UVA, Chicago, Michigan, Harvard ect have better QoL, nah, lol, unless you like small towns and bars that close early. At Columbia, the campus is gorgeous; the neighborhood pleasant with relatively easy access to more traditional city fun a few stops on the 1; people are friendly for the most part and interesting/accomplished - they take their shit seriously (sometimes too seriously), but that's why we are here; there's a ton of intellectually or professionally engaging activities, free food and ways to get involved, such as lunch talks, pro bono in the city, ect. And most importantly, people get great jobs, and in large numbers. The flaws (and of course, there are many) are surely more symptomatic of law school as a whole, and not this law school. Law school as an institution, as a concept, is pretty horrible. It's MO is to suck. Columbia is so much better than most.
ETA: we also have our share of wonderful brilliant profs, and terrible useless ones, and just total assholes. Maybe CLS attracts mildly more asshole profs than some schools, but most law professors across the discipline and the academy are problematic
- 2807
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
HilariousSilverE2 wrote:You write weird.
Awesome
- smaug_
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:06 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Ha ha this thread is a blast from the past.
If people are worried, they should come visit. I don't think we're that bad. I know I have a good time. I also hope that the administration stuff gets better with the new dean. It seems like some good changes have been made in Schizer's final year, though. (GSF increase/expansion, student org fee stuff, small improvements to JG)
If people are worried, they should come visit. I don't think we're that bad. I know I have a good time. I also hope that the administration stuff gets better with the new dean. It seems like some good changes have been made in Schizer's final year, though. (GSF increase/expansion, student org fee stuff, small improvements to JG)
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Guchster should come back to post.
- girlmonster
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 10:46 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
It's good to hear from the unhappy as well as the happy folks (because every school, workplace, etc. has both). At least this reaffirms my decision to bring my dog, so when classes end each day, I can bury my face in her fur and cry.
Also, I dig the way OP writes. OP, I would be your friend... if only we weren't so many years apart.
Also, I dig the way OP writes. OP, I would be your friend... if only we weren't so many years apart.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
This is TCR.girlmonster wrote:At least this reaffirms my decision to bring my dog, so when classes end each day, I can bury my face in her fur and cry.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Trying to correct the english syntax "something there is" is like telling Blackstone he should read a law text or something. Robert Frost kicked the English language's ass.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
there is only one way to fix this, you learn to love and wake up everyday ready to gun.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:I sat down to write my "Fuck CLS" list but I couldn't come up with more than professors are assholes (true anywhere), the administration sucks (probably also true anywhere), and everything is way too fucking expensive (welcome to New York). It really doesn't make anything worse than a competitive law school has to be--if you're not happy here, you wouldn't be happy at Chicago, or Penn, or UVA, or Duke. The whole "CLS is uniquely full of cutthroat gunners" thing is absolute horseshit.jbagelboy wrote:Columbia administration is meh at best and has been ritualistically disappointing - I'll grant OP so much - but the students are fine. The person who said Duke, UVA, Chicago, Michigan, Harvard ect have better QoL, nah, lol, unless you like small towns and bars that close early. At Columbia, the campus is gorgeous; the neighborhood pleasant with relatively easy access to more traditional city fun a few stops on the 1; people are friendly for the most part and interesting/accomplished - they take their shit seriously (sometimes too seriously), but that's why we are here; there's a ton of intellectually or professionally engaging activities, free food and ways to get involved, such as lunch talks, pro bono in the city, ect. And most importantly, people get great jobs, and in large numbers. The flaws (and of course, there are many) are surely more symptomatic of law school as a whole, and not this law school. Law school as an institution, as a concept, is pretty horrible. It's MO is to suck. Columbia is so much better than most.
ETA: we also have our share of wonderful brilliant profs, and terrible useless ones, and just total assholes. Maybe CLS attracts mildly more asshole profs than some schools, but most law professors across the discipline and the academy are problematic
- Stanford4Me
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:23 am
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Mal Reynolds wrote:Guchster should come back to post.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ratfukr
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 5:44 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
jfc @ all the illiterates ITT who didn't catch that as mending wall immediately
who pays any attention 2 the syntax of things
who pays any attention 2 the syntax of things
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:14 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
CLS sounds precisely as pleasant as you would expect a law school filled with butt hurt Harvard rejects and preposterously egoistical, scandal-prone profs to be.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Ouch.Skump wrote:CLS sounds precisely as pleasant as you would expect a law school filled with butt hurt Harvard rejects and preposterously egoistical, scandal-prone profs to be.
Not really. Although the preposterously egotistical profs part has some merit in a few cases.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Not that either of those accusations are untrue, but it's weird to attack a place for being egotistical while simultaneously attacking it for not being Harvard.Skump wrote:CLS sounds precisely as pleasant as you would expect a law school filled with butt hurt Harvard rejects and preposterously egoistical, scandal-prone profs to be.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wiz
- Posts: 44572
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Not that I agree with what the bro said, but he called out the profs for being egotistical.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Not that either of those accusations are untrue, but it's weird to attack a place for being egotistical while simultaneously attacking it for not being Harvard.Skump wrote:CLS sounds precisely as pleasant as you would expect a law school filled with butt hurt Harvard rejects and preposterously egoistical, scandal-prone profs to be.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
I was guessing it was a more general claim than saying that CLS profs are egotistical. The latter is sort of "duh", just like every law professors everywhere. Believing that $250k/yr for 30 hours a week with flexible schedules, summers off and lifetime protection is at all an adequate representation of the value a professor provides requires a pretty staggering ego.wiz wrote:Not that I agree with what the bro said, but he called out the profs for being egotistical.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Not that either of those accusations are untrue, but it's weird to attack a place for being egotistical while simultaneously attacking it for not being Harvard.Skump wrote:CLS sounds precisely as pleasant as you would expect a law school filled with butt hurt Harvard rejects and preposterously egoistical, scandal-prone profs to be.
Not sure what the "scandal-ridden" refers to. Only thing I can think of is fact that everyone seems to have a problem with a sixty-something guy marrying one of his students.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Something there is about Columbia that loves to suck
Seems like there would be more gunners at like a T2 or someplace where you abso-fucking-lutely have to finish top 10% or get lifepwned. No point in killing each other at a place where 80-85% who want Biglaw get it.sublime wrote:
Also, it really wouldn't surprise me if Columbia has the most, or close the most gunners out of any school as a result of their employment and salary out comes. May be (and probably is) a negligible difference in comparison to other top schools though.
Would I go there if I had the chance? Absofuckinglutely.
Of course, type A dudes are self-selecting into T14 anyway. You could spend three years at HLS smoking blunts daily and still be just fine, and yet people are still high-strung anyway.
Haven't heard of anything here that's uniquely crazy. Although I'm pulling all-nighters in February, so that's sort of weird.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login