Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=183660
the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer.honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?
Username irony ftw.martinriggs wrote:the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer.honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?
you are done.honestapplicant wrote:i figured it out thx
QFTmartinriggs wrote:the purpose being served would be the one that wouldnt have you posting questions about our take home con law exam on top law schools trying to get the answer.honestapplicant wrote:If the government tries to bar a woman from becoming president on textual grounds, what governmental purpose is being served?
Funny thing is.. the question isnt that diffiult. Definitely not worth asking on TLS and risking your nuts. I suppose any question isn't worth that; but, still, I think I oculd have come up with a decent answer to that question - and I haven't paid much attention in conlaw this semester.Jessuf wrote:so do you go to Duke?
Bildungsroman wrote:It's not at all suspicious that you immediately went back and wiped all your old posts. LOL
Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.alabamabound wrote: Username irony ftw.
Data?tyro wrote:Yeah..when someone feels like they have to say they're honest or humble in their username you kind of wonder why they thought it was something to be questioned in the first place.alabamabound wrote: Username irony ftw.
dabomb75 wrote:Wonder if someone really wanted to catch this person how hard it would actually be
I would say it's someone who had another username on here and then made a new one to post some shit anonomously. I wouldn't be that surprised if f7u12 already knew who it was and made a special file for themVerity wrote:I like how OP has two total posts, but implies a strong familiarity with the ways of TLS. Something's a-brewin'.....honestapplicant wrote:
Yes, the obligatory witty TLS response
next
+1. Streisand effectangrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
+2angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
Legendary.Extension_Cord wrote:+2angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.
Nope.ben4847 wrote:Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?