What is the most famous 1L case?
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:22 am
What is the most famous 1L case?
Please vote and name any I have missed so I can add them.
Please vote and name any I have missed so I can add them.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=178629
he didn't ask for the most infamous caseflcath wrote:Pennoyer
The other cases (Erie, Palsgraff) actually stand for a legal principle, i.e., they are important to the legal industry as a whole. Pennoyer is a confusing, bullshit case that's known only for its inexplicable inclusion in 1L Civ Pro courses.
funny that you vote hawkins, given that de geest doesn't even do that case. made me feel like i missed something in my legal education when i watched paper chase recently.romothesavior wrote:I voted Hawkins. The Paper Chase made it more famous than the rest.
The carbolic smoke ball and barren cow cases also stuck with me for some reason.
That's why I voted for it. Even Dudley is relevant when it's not even an American case.flcath wrote:Pennoyer
The other cases (Erie, Palsgraff) actually stand for a legal principle, i.e., they are important to the legal industry as a whole. Pennoyer is a confusing, bullshit case that's known only for its inexplicable inclusion in 1L Civ Pro courses.
Looks like somebody never got to Burnham.flcath wrote:Pennoyer is a confusing, bullshit case that's known only for its inexplicable inclusion in 1L Civ Pro courses.
How is that possible?LawMan20 wrote:Haven't heard of/read any of them besides Marbury.
I'm guessing you didn't understand Erie; Marbury has nothing to do with Pierson, Hawkings, Palsgraf, etc.Mce252 wrote:How can it not be Marbury? None of those other cases would be nearly as important without it.
We're looking at famous, not important. The fact that I know all about the Palsgraf as a 0L gives it a little more famous status in my mind.Mce252 wrote:How can it not be Marbury? None of those other cases would be nearly as important without it.
Two consecutive responses that RC failed the thread title. Nice.InGoodFaith wrote:We're looking at famous, not important. The fact that I know all about the Palsgraf as a 0L gives it a little more famous status in my mind.Mce252 wrote:How can it not be Marbury? None of those other cases would be nearly as important without it.
wutAntilles Haven wrote:Two consecutive responses that RC failed the thread title. Nice.InGoodFaith wrote:We're looking at famous, not important. The fact that I know all about the Palsgraf as a 0L gives it a little more famous status in my mind.Mce252 wrote:How can it not be Marbury? None of those other cases would be nearly as important without it.
And if we're talking about most important, then Martin v. Hunter's Lessee wins.
He's right. You clearly haven't taken Fed.Courts.InGoodFaith wrote:wutAntilles Haven wrote:Two consecutive responses that RC failed the thread title. Nice.InGoodFaith wrote:We're looking at famous, not important. The fact that I know all about the Palsgraf as a 0L gives it a little more famous status in my mind.Mce252 wrote:How can it not be Marbury? None of those other cases would be nearly as important without it.
And if we're talking about most important, then Martin v. Hunter's Lessee wins.
Let me help you:InGoodFaith wrote:wut
Thread Title wrote:most famous 1L case
InGoodFaith wrote:as a 0L
So the case can no longer be described as a 1L case because the person referencing it isn't a 1L?Antilles Haven wrote:Let me help you:InGoodFaith wrote:wut
Thread Title wrote:most famous 1L caseInGoodFaith wrote:as a 0L