Criminal Law Exam Strategy Question Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
always206

New
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:38 pm

Criminal Law Exam Strategy Question

Post by always206 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:36 am

Question:

Do you rec. the following?


Statute: elements 1) 2) 3)

Actus Rea: Define for first issue, then ("supra") elements for other issues? That way you're not redefining again?

Mens Rea: Same as above.

Walk through elements: 1) 2) 3)

Counterargument(s):

Conclusion:

Thanks for your advice!

FWIW: My prof. is very heavy on statutes. We go over select cases to help define a term w/in a statute. He said we shouldn't have to name a case on the exam.

User avatar
lifestooquick

Silver
Posts: 1200
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: Criminal Law Exam Strategy Question

Post by lifestooquick » Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:16 pm

My professor gives us the layout he wants and basically requires we use his organization. We use:

Heading for which issue you are addresing (i.e. Alice v. Bob: Criminal Homicide)

I. Voluntary Act
II. Social Harm
III. Mens Rea
IV. Actual Cause
V. Proximate Cause

Repeat for each issue.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: Criminal Law Exam Strategy Question

Post by kalvano » Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:37 pm

A checklist for each crime would be very helpful.

Just so you don't miss something like felony murder.

User avatar
5ky

Diamond
Posts: 10835
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm

Re: Criminal Law Exam Strategy Question

Post by 5ky » Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:12 am

MPC vs. common law

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”