Practice Exams Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Practice Exams

Post by kalvano » Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:37 pm

I was pretty fortunate last year in that almost all of my professors had available old exams. This year, not so much. Is it better not to practice with exams from other profs / schools, or is it still good studying?

kahechsof

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:26 pm

Re: Practice Exams

Post by kahechsof » Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:55 pm

yes, practice with other schools/professors.
And notice when the questions are irrelevant to what you learned and skip them.

morris248

Bronze
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:30 am

Re: Practice Exams

Post by morris248 » Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:16 pm

Another good tip is that if old bar exams/answers for your state are available to practice with them. That is your ultimate goal anyway, to pass the bar.

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Practice Exams

Post by ggocat » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:12 pm

I think the benefit of practice exams is training yourself to spot issues. After 1L, I don't think you should need that training anymore. (But of course, you are the best judge of what you need.) The only benefit I found for 2L/3L practice exams (when available from prof) was to see what topics the prof liked and how the exam was structured. After 1L, I didn't do any practice exams for classes when the prof didn't make them available. I think it would be unnecessary.

So I vote "no."

But I guess it depends on the situation. For example, if your evidence prof will be doing MC questions, I would probably practice on some MBE evidence questions.

kahechsof

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:26 pm

Re: Practice Exams

Post by kahechsof » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:15 pm

ggocat wrote:I think the benefit of practice exams is training yourself to spot issues. After 1L, I don't think you should need that training anymore. The only benefit I found for 2L/3L practice exams (when available from prof) was to see what topics the prof liked and how the exam was structured. After 1L, I didn't do any practice exams for classes when the prof didn't make them available. I think it would be unnecessary.

So I vote "no."
Hmmm. I completely disagree.
For me, the main purpose of practice exams was to get used to thinking about the material in real circumstances, especially how it worked together as a whole, and mapping out what an answer would look like. (Ex. in contracts, start with offer and acceptance, and move through consideration and other validity issues up to remedies.)
So I plan to use practice exams as my main study tool in 2L and 3L as well.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: Practice Exams

Post by kalvano » Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:13 pm

Yeah, I use the practice exams to sort of wrap my head around the issues and see how best to bring them out in exam format.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”