Top Law Schools

Posted: **Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:55 pm**

Title says it. Is there a material difference? The older one is way cheaper on amazon.

Posted: **Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:10 pm**

The law of torts doesn't really change much. It took 400 years or so for the concept of fault to be fully accepted. Maybe there's been some changes in products liability or business torts, but we didn't cover that deeply enough in torts to worry about it.

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:53 pm**

TTH wrote:The law of torts doesn't really change much. It took 400 years or so for the concept of fault to be fully accepted. Maybe there's been some changes in products liability or business torts, but we didn't cover that deeply enough in torts to worry about it.

Thanks!

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:34 pm**

The law of torts doesn't really change much

Agreed but 2002 is fairly old. All you need for torts is the E&E or Glannon Guide.

Top Law Schools

Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009? Forum

Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?