ITT, you list reasons why 3L is useful for people w/ offers
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:53 pm
There are none.
/thread
/thread
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=163722
If you go to a school that allows you to take classes at other graduate programs, you can learn some awesome stuff that will make you happy/help you prepare for your practice.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are none.
/thread
Time would be better spent practicing. Less debt, more on point learning.TaipeiMort wrote:If you go to a school that allows you to take classes at other graduate programs, you can learn some awesome stuff that will make you happy/help you prepare for your practice.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are none.
/thread
Do you mean in a "we should get rid of 3L and move to a different model" way, or a "why should I not skip all of my classes and put in just enough work to barely graduate" way?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are none.
/thread
Wrt #3, I assume firms that you lateral to have grade cutoffs similar to those used for hiring 2L SAs, is this right? If so, I would think a top 25% person at a T10 doesn't have much to worry about. I'm not counting on lateraling to W&C, Covington, SullCrom, Susman, or Cravath. Also, UVA doesn't give latin honors (although "Order of the Coif" is given to top 10% people, but this would be a longshot for me). I'm not planning on clerking. I seriously doubt the veracity of your final point because I've heard from several partners that grades don't matter by the time you've worked for 8-10 years. I think I'll be just fine wrt #2 because of my pre-law work experience. Finally, I'm not at a firm like those #1 would apply to.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Do you mean in a "we should get rid of 3L and move to a different model" way, or a "why should I not skip all of my classes and put in just enough work to barely graduate" way?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are none.
/thread
If the former, there are none at all. 3L is retarded.
If the latter:
1.) Firms that will no-offer based on 2L grades can yank offers based on 3L grades. Not many firms in this category, but make sure yours isn't one.
2.) Having impressive resume lines will make your life somewhat easier if you're going to a free-market firm: everyone I have talked to at Kirkland agrees with that. This applies only early in your career, and it's not as important as the quality of the work you did over the summer, but it still matters.
3.) Grades still matter if you try to lateral out relatively early in your career.
4.) Grades still matters if you decide to try to enter the alumni clerking market, etc. etc.
5.) If you're clerking, and want to try to "trade-up" in firms post-clerkship, your 3L grades will matter for that.
I also think that having certain resume lines might nominally improve partnership chances, in that the firm thinks it might make your firm bio page more attractive to prospective business. The impact here would be *incredibly* slight, though.
Not just talking firm laterals WRT #2, talking non-firm options.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:Wrt #3, I assume firms that you lateral to have grade cutoffs similar to those used for hiring 2L SAs, is this right? If so, I would think a top 25% person at a T10 doesn't have much to worry about. I'm not counting on lateraling to W&C, Covington, SullCrom, Susman, or Cravath. Also, UVA doesn't give latin honors (although "Order of the Coif" is given to top 10% people, but this would be a longshot for me). I'm not planning on clerking. I seriously doubt the veracity of your final point because I've heard from several partners that grades don't matter by the time you've worked for 8-10 years. I think I'll be just fine wrt #2 because of my pre-law work experience. Finally, I'm not at a firm like those #1 would apply to.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Do you mean in a "we should get rid of 3L and move to a different model" way, or a "why should I not skip all of my classes and put in just enough work to barely graduate" way?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are none.
/thread
If the former, there are none at all. 3L is retarded.
If the latter:
1.) Firms that will no-offer based on 2L grades can yank offers based on 3L grades. Not many firms in this category, but make sure yours isn't one.
2.) Having impressive resume lines will make your life somewhat easier if you're going to a free-market firm: everyone I have talked to at Kirkland agrees with that. This applies only early in your career, and it's not as important as the quality of the work you did over the summer, but it still matters.
3.) Grades still matter if you try to lateral out relatively early in your career.
4.) Grades still matters if you decide to try to enter the alumni clerking market, etc. etc.
5.) If you're clerking, and want to try to "trade-up" in firms post-clerkship, your 3L grades will matter for that.
I also think that having certain resume lines might nominally improve partnership chances, in that the firm thinks it might make your firm bio page more attractive to prospective business. The impact here would be *incredibly* slight, though.
Unless you don't have loans, this is an unmitigated terrible thing.smokyroom26 wrote:Um, one more year of being a student instead of a member of the workforce.
Party time.
/thread
I have loans. I was being cheeky.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Unless you don't have loans, this is an unmitigated terrible thing.smokyroom26 wrote:Um, one more year of being a student instead of a member of the workforce.
Party time.
/thread