Page 1 of 1
GTM question
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:47 pm
by theturkeyisfat
would it be useful to outline GTM and memorize the different types of forks/ambiguities that the book points out? or is it enough to just understand that the whole point is to look out for and embrace ambiguities?
Re: GTM question
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:22 pm
by Seminole_305
I am reading it again for the second time (just to embed the ideas of it in my mind) and this has crossed my mind.
Re: GTM question
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:16 pm
by 09042014
theturkeyisfat wrote:would it be useful to outline GTM and memorize the different types of forks/ambiguities that the book points out? or is it enough to just understand that the whole point is to look out for and embrace ambiguities?
The later IMO. Focusing on the type is doing it wrong.
Re: GTM question
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:39 am
by kswiss
Honestly read through it once now, and then mark a day in early october to read it again. Then take some practice tests.
Its a very good book for those that are clueless, but you'll find that it states the obvious for the most part. But most 1Ls are pretty clueless, (I was.) Still good to read though, just realize that the fact that you read GTM 3 times won't be what determines your placement on the curve.
Re: GTM question
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:46 pm
by YourCaptain
theturkeyisfat wrote:would it be useful to outline GTM and memorize the different types of forks/ambiguities that the book points out? or is it enough to just understand that the whole point is to look out for and embrace ambiguities?
yes