Top Law Schools

Hi Guys,

I have seen two standards, "arise out of," or "arise out of, or relate to," to describe specific jurisdiction. The most common appears to be the former, but I read one case where the latter was mentioned. Obviously the latter is much broader and would be advantageous for a plaintiff in many ways.

My question is: which is correct? is there no consensus and on an exam it is best to note the two interpretations? Thanks guys.

PJ is mushy, the more arguments for both sides you can throw around, the more points you will get.

Don't forget that before a claim "arises from" an action, the actor usually has to "avail themselves of the benefits and protections" of the forum state.