Page 1 of 1

Comstock

Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 3:06 am
by Charles Barkley
What does this case mean in regards to the necessary and proper clause? Obviously it expands it's power. But what is the rationale behind the decision?

I can't help but agree with Scalia and Thomas' dissent..

Re: Comstock

Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:52 am
by omnomnom
GW Law Revue wrote:Professor, I concur with the Scalia dissent...