Re: An Over/Under Challenge
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:03 am
April 2nd.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=149116
Well this was over quickfatduck wrote:January 10th.
that thread is sweet. no doubt OP is a clown (for the reasons you mentioned). check out the folks who respond though. equally clownish?G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Damn, don't I feel stupid, and yet prescient all at the same time. Or something.AreJay711 wrote:Well this was over quickfatduck wrote:January 10th.
The challenge is now when the NEXT such ranking will be created, as surely there will be more.
I think that thread was even worse than average. This guy/gal gets it:joobacca wrote:that thread is sweet. no doubt OP is a clown (for the reasons you mentioned). check out the folks who respond though. equally clownish?G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Damn, don't I feel stupid, and yet prescient all at the same time. Or something.AreJay711 wrote:Well this was over quickfatduck wrote:January 10th.
The challenge is now when the NEXT such ranking will be created, as surely there will be more.
Bronte wrote:Imagine this scenario: 50 students at both school X and school Y want the best clerkships they can get. At school X, 5 students get Article III clerkships and the rest do not get clerkships at all. At school Y, 10 students get Article III clerkships and another 10 get non-AIII clerkships.
Who wins in your ranking system? Who should win?
Also: what about public interest placement?