3.2 gpa, now what? Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:10 pm
3.2 gpa, now what?
tips for getting this crap gpa up 2nd semester 1L?
- thuggishruggishbone
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:53 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
just talk to profs about what went wrong--usually it's you missed issues on the exam. just do your best to try to get that gpa up for oci
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:31 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
that is not a crap gpa lol
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
You don't know where the OP goes to school.lawstudent8685 wrote:that is not a crap gpa lol
- savagedm
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:51 am
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Word, at my school that's a great GPA because the curve is artificially deflated to a low B-. But there are many schools which the curve is set at a solid B, which would mean the OP got maybe one or two grades above the curve, or a few above it and a couple really below it. It's all relative.bk187 wrote:You don't know where the OP goes to school.lawstudent8685 wrote:that is not a crap gpa lol
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bustang
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:26 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
How do you know OP goes to your school?Bustang wrote:3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
- Bustang
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:26 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
I don't. I was simply reinforcing what others were saying in this thread.bk187 wrote:How do you know OP goes to your school?Bustang wrote:3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Some schools curve to a 3.3 and higher. If op goes to one of those schools, his gpa is indeed crap.
No need to speculate.
No need to speculate.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
So basically saying something completely pointless?Bustang wrote:I don't. I was simply reinforcing what others were saying in this thread.bk187 wrote:How do you know OP goes to your school?Bustang wrote:3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
I don't want to give away my school-but yeah it one that curves high. 3.2 is a little below median. Not sure what the hell i'm gonna do next semester
- savagedm
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:51 am
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
bk187 wrote:So basically saying something completely pointless?Bustang wrote:I don't. I was simply reinforcing what others were saying in this thread.bk187 wrote:How do you know OP goes to your school?Bustang wrote:3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
- Bustang
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:26 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
I was being optimistic for the OP. Shoot me.bk187 wrote:So basically saying something completely pointless?Bustang wrote:I don't. I was simply reinforcing what others were saying in this thread.bk187 wrote:How do you know OP goes to your school?Bustang wrote:3.2 at my school is top 30%. I don't think that qualifies as "crap."
But, yes.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:17 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Good schools often have "easy" curves and bad schools often have "hard" curves. I would be much happier with a 3.2 below median at a T6 than a 3.2 above median at a T4 that curves to a C+.
3.2 being above or below median is relevant, but the school is relevant as well.
3.2 being above or below median is relevant, but the school is relevant as well.
- Gatriel
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
3.2 doesn't mean much. What is your schools median?theplaymaker wrote:tips for getting this crap gpa up 2nd semester 1L?
- Ialdabaoth
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
I'm sorry if this is an ignorant question, but what does it really mean, in practice, for students when their schools have "high" or "low" curves? It seems to me that the GPA number at which the curve is set isn't really that important since class rank/being above or below median seems to be more important than absolute GPA numbers. Again, sorry if I don't know what I'm talking about.random5483 wrote:Good schools often have "easy" curves and bad schools often have "hard" curves. I would be much happier with a 3.2 below median at a T6 than a 3.2 above median at a T4 that curves to a C+.
3.2 being above or below median is relevant, but the school is relevant as well.
- Gatriel
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
So lets say you have a 3.0 GPA.
In a school with a "high curve" the median score would be say a 3.33, which makes that 3.0 a poor score, as it is sub median, however if the school has a "low curve" the median score might be a 2.67 thus making the 3.0 an excellent GPA. Schools have differing medians for differing reasons, I believe it is an element of the CDO to make their students look better than X schools students because their students GPA is higher.
For example, Loyola recently changed their median GPA from a B (3.0) to a B+ (3.33) curve, and doing it retroactively for 3 past years. Ergo, someone who graduated from Loyola in 09 with a 3.0 now has a 3.33. Their class rank hasn't changed, but for lay paralegals who might sort resumes for an attorney in a large firm a higher GPA looks better even if the class rank in the same.
Hope that helps!
In a school with a "high curve" the median score would be say a 3.33, which makes that 3.0 a poor score, as it is sub median, however if the school has a "low curve" the median score might be a 2.67 thus making the 3.0 an excellent GPA. Schools have differing medians for differing reasons, I believe it is an element of the CDO to make their students look better than X schools students because their students GPA is higher.
For example, Loyola recently changed their median GPA from a B (3.0) to a B+ (3.33) curve, and doing it retroactively for 3 past years. Ergo, someone who graduated from Loyola in 09 with a 3.0 now has a 3.33. Their class rank hasn't changed, but for lay paralegals who might sort resumes for an attorney in a large firm a higher GPA looks better even if the class rank in the same.
Hope that helps!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:17 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Ialdabaoth wrote:I'm sorry if this is an ignorant question, but what does it really mean, in practice, for students when their schools have "high" or "low" curves? It seems to me that the GPA number at which the curve is set isn't really that important since class rank/being above or below median seems to be more important than absolute GPA numbers. Again, sorry if I don't know what I'm talking about.random5483 wrote:Good schools often have "easy" curves and bad schools often have "hard" curves. I would be much happier with a 3.2 below median at a T6 than a 3.2 above median at a T4 that curves to a C+.
3.2 being above or below median is relevant, but the school is relevant as well.
My comment was directed at the people who place all their focus on whether the student is above or below median. I merely was commenting that a 3.2 below median GPA at a top ranked school is a much better position than a 3.2 above median GPA at an average or low ranked school. Simply put, since GPA scales by school and since the school's ranking is unknown we cannot accurately gauge the poster's situation.
A school's curve has a very limited impact for its applicants. Most legal employers know about school rankings and they focus on class rank more than merely GPA. However, with governmental employment for example, there are often strict GPA cutoffs. A school with a more lenient curve would have a higher percentage of applicants qualify for the aforesaid jobs.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:48 am
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
It's contingent upon the curve, not necessary GPA as it was in undergraduate school. LS= curved and thus GPA's vary
- Ialdabaoth
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Thanks for the explanations everybody--very helpful! And I didn't know about the GPA cutoffs for some government positions. That's interesting and seems to be another reason (at least for me) to attend a top school with a high curve. Thanks for the info!
- Gatriel
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
Ialdabaoth wrote:Thanks for the explanations everybody--very helpful! And I didn't know about the GPA cutoffs for some government positions. That's interesting and seems to be another reason (at least for me) to attend a top school with a high curve. Thanks for the info!
Many "top" schools don't have a curve or GPA at all. It is just Low Pass -> Pass -> High Pass. This is definitely the way you want to go.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: 3.2 gpa, now what?
theplaymaker wrote:tips for getting this crap gpa up 2nd semester 1L?
Dude, seriously, quit having conversations with yourself. Banned for alting.thuggishruggishbone wrote:just talk to profs about what went wrong--usually it's you missed issues on the exam. just do your best to try to get that gpa up for oci
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login