Pre-Written Answers Forum
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Pre-Written Answers
How do you guys feel about pre-written answers? Have they been successful in the past? Will it get you an A or a B?
We are allowed our rulebook for Civ Pro but I've already memorized all the rules and application for the most part so I was thinking of putting it to good use and writing out model answers.
Advice?
We are allowed our rulebook for Civ Pro but I've already memorized all the rules and application for the most part so I was thinking of putting it to good use and writing out model answers.
Advice?
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
You do well on law exams by applying law to facts. You don't know the facts in the exam question yet. How could you possibly write out a useful answer when you're missing half of what you need?
- joobacca
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:49 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
i think it's a waste of time.DaydreamBeliever wrote:How do you guys feel about pre-written answers? Have they been successful in the past? Will it get you an A or a B?
We are allowed our rulebook for Civ Pro but I've already memorized all the rules and application for the most part so I was thinking of putting it to good use and writing out model answers.
Advice?
i thought about doing this for an open book exam. i never tried it because i decided to spend what little time i had on hypos. i think it's a waste of time because you could be doing hypos, which really help you out with the most important aspect of exam taking: issue spotting. it also gives you a feel of what A papers do (spot more issues than others; argue both sides (and incorporate policy in these arguments); and sometimes propose some really good ideas).
i think it's not a bad idea, if it's open book, to write down some things that are definitely going to show up. for instance, if you're guaranteed to have search and seizure on your exam, then you might want to write out the rule so that you can just type it out without thinking (perhaps giving yourself a little break). but beyond that, i think it's a bad idea. i haven't done some in depth analysis into the feasibility of this, but i suspect that there are too many permutations to make this approach worthwhile. the most important part is issue spotting and analysis. write down the rules and fuck trying to guess the exam.
edit: by typing out the rule, i meant the "setup" that will lead to your analysis. your analysis, i feel, can only be done at the exam because you have to use facts...
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I see what you both are saying and I understand and appreciate the input.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I definitely second taking practice tests. Actually practicing out writing out your answers, and the way that makes you think about applying the law, will help you do better on test day.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
It depends on what you bottleneck on. I bottleneck on writing, so I write out my practice exams several times so I have a skeleton answer for each type of analysis. If you bottleneck on issue spotting, you should spend more time doing hypos.
The only way you can tell which is your bottleneck is to take timed practice exams.
The only way you can tell which is your bottleneck is to take timed practice exams.
- zeth006
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:54 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
It's not even that. All K's, torts, etc exams are basically the SAMs. You know you'll talk about contract formation, then interpretation, etc. So if you've got a skeleton ready to go, you just need to plug in the facts.zeth006 wrote:It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:18 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
rayiner wrote:It's not even that. All K's, torts, etc exams are basically the SAMs. You know you'll talk about contract formation, then interpretation, etc. So if you've got a skeleton ready to go, you just need to plug in the facts.zeth006 wrote:It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
Very true. For open-book exams, I like to have the rules I KNOW will be on the exam written out so I don't have to waste time wording them/looking them up. As you said, you'll need to know the definition of offer, acceptance, contract, etc., so have these pre-written.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
this seems to be basically the same thing as a bullet point outlinedougroberts wrote:rayiner wrote:It's not even that. All K's, torts, etc exams are basically the SAMs. You know you'll talk about contract formation, then interpretation, etc. So if you've got a skeleton ready to go, you just need to plug in the facts.zeth006 wrote:It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
Very true. For open-book exams, I like to have the rules I KNOW will be on the exam written out so I don't have to waste time wording them/looking them up. As you said, you'll need to know the definition of offer, acceptance, contract, etc., so have these pre-written.
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LAWYER2
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:15 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
i think it's a waste of time.
i thought about doing this for an open book exam. i never tried it because i decided to spend what little time i had on hypos. i think it's a waste of time because you could be doing hypos, which really help you out with the most important aspect of exam taking: issue spotting. it also gives you a feel of what A papers do (spot more issues than others; argue both sides (and incorporate policy in these arguments); and sometimes propose some really good ideas).
i think it's not a bad idea, if it's open book, to write down some things that are definitely going to show up. for instance, if you're guaranteed to have search and seizure on your exam, then you might want to write out the rule so that you can just type it out without thinking (perhaps giving yourself a little break). but beyond that, i think it's a bad idea. i haven't done some in depth analysis into the feasibility of this, but i suspect that there are too many permutations to make this approach worthwhile. the most important part is issue spotting and analysis. write down the rules and fuck trying to guess the exam.
edit: by typing out the rule, i meant the "setup" that will lead to your analysis. your analysis, i feel, can only be done at the exam because you have to use facts...
this is all MONEY right here!!
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:18 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
Except outlines are usually not full sentences or thoughts, but fragments and short rules. I'm talking about a full paragraph stating the rule from, say, a statute and then a case backing it up. Then, when this topic comes up on the exam (which you know it will if it is an important one), then you just copy/paste it in (or retype it in), then next paragraph would be a more specific rule if there is, and then apply/conclusion.Borhas wrote:this seems to be basically the same thing as a bullet point outlinedougroberts wrote:rayiner wrote:It's not even that. All K's, torts, etc exams are basically the SAMs. You know you'll talk about contract formation, then interpretation, etc. So if you've got a skeleton ready to go, you just need to plug in the facts.zeth006 wrote:It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
Very true. For open-book exams, I like to have the rules I KNOW will be on the exam written out so I don't have to waste time wording them/looking them up. As you said, you'll need to know the definition of offer, acceptance, contract, etc., so have these pre-written.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- uzpakalis
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:36 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I have pre-written "starter" answers for all of my classes (open book). For example, in Civ Pro, I have short answers for PJ, SMJ, Rules, Erie, etc. Basically it gives the rule and requirements in a canned answer, then all that is left is to apply it to the facts. I think this will help improve my speed because I won't have to think of exactly how I want to phrase something. I just copy it from my notes, and move on to the analysis. This concept seems to also work really well for torts, and to a lesser extent, property.
- joobacca
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:49 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
yea, this was what i was trying to get at in my earlier post. some professors give you an extra point or something if you are organized like this. for example, one of my professors said that a point was award on an issue if a student laid out the rule right off the bat. so, for example, "the prima facie elements of negligence are duty, breach, cause-in-fact, prox cause, and damage." i found this a bit ridiculous because in every negligence discussion i would lay out those elements by having a separate "section" for each. but the professor makes the rules. so i think this type of system is really good for catching easy, non-brainer points. and maybe it helps because the relevant rules are right there and you're typing them. i would also include more than just the bare bone rule, and try to convey what the rule is trying to achieve, and possibly other policy stuff. but that depends on the rule and context of the fact pattern.uzpakalis wrote:I have pre-written "starter" answers for all of my classes (open book). For example, in Civ Pro, I have short answers for PJ, SMJ, Rules, Erie, etc. Basically it gives the rule and requirements in a canned answer, then all that is left is to apply it to the facts. I think this will help improve my speed because I won't have to think of exactly how I want to phrase something. I just copy it from my notes, and move on to the analysis. This concept seems to also work really well for torts, and to a lesser extent, property.
but this can kill a lot time, and i do this at the very end. usually i'll just take someone's response from a hypo that i liked and dump/collect them in a file and print it. i think hypos are most important, after you understand wtf is going on in the subject (which is a real time drain). so final point, and i will leave this thread, is that don't get too bogged down by this stuff. it'll capture some points, but you have to think about how many points you're losing because you haven't looked at a ton of hypos. more points, i think, can be earned through proper analysis and issue spotting than good organization. if you have the luxury of time, then go for the gold. otherwise prioritize wisely and you might still get that A.
- Lawl Shcool
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
TITCR at least for civ pro. I pre-wrote out all my rule statements in sentence form and got the high grade, 2nd highest grade did the same thing too. Saves time and ensures you hit all the points in your analysis. Doesn't work as well for other, more common law based, classes but can be done to some extent.uzpakalis wrote:I have pre-written "starter" answers for all of my classes (open book). For example, in Civ Pro, I have short answers for PJ, SMJ, Rules, Erie, etc. Basically it gives the rule and requirements in a canned answer, then all that is left is to apply it to the facts. I think this will help improve my speed because I won't have to think of exactly how I want to phrase something. I just copy it from my notes, and move on to the analysis. This concept seems to also work really well for torts, and to a lesser extent, property.
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:53 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I did that for CivPro last year too. Worked out well.
Just be sure to use the right intro for each issue. You know, answer the question actually asked.
Just be sure to use the right intro for each issue. You know, answer the question actually asked.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
What do you mean the right intro?
I know everyone is busy but would someone mind taking a look over some of my pre-written answers?
I know everyone is busy but would someone mind taking a look over some of my pre-written answers?
- ChattTNdt
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:02 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
DaydreamBeliever wrote:What do you mean the right intro?
I know everyone is busy but would someone mind taking a look over some of my pre-written answers?
The right intro = a canned statement of the applicable rule of law. The R in IRAC.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
Would you mind if I PMed you some of my pre-writs to look over?ChattTNdt wrote:DaydreamBeliever wrote:What do you mean the right intro?
I know everyone is busy but would someone mind taking a look over some of my pre-written answers?
The right intro = a canned statement of the applicable rule of law. The R in IRAC.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
As others have pointed out already, this largely depends on your professor. My Civ Pro professor recycled the same exact issue on each of his exams from 1986-2008 - so, yea, I pre-wrote the shit out of that answer. My Torts professor pulled her fact patterns out of legal publications and tweaked them a bit - so, no, I knew the BLL cold, kept an open mind, and did my best to creatively apply law to fact. My Property professor generally focused on 5 small snippets of the class, but only one of those issues consistently reappeared on the exam, whereas the others seemed to rotate - so I took a hybrid approach of the above styles of preparation.
But how did I know all of this going in? Ding ding ding! I took every available exam that I could get my hands on, which is the best thing that anyone can do to prepare for law school exams, IMO.
But how did I know all of this going in? Ding ding ding! I took every available exam that I could get my hands on, which is the best thing that anyone can do to prepare for law school exams, IMO.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
please check PMseespotrun wrote:As others have pointed out already, this largely depends on your professor. My Civ Pro professor recycled the same exact issue on each of his exams from 1986-2008 - so, yea, I pre-wrote the shit out of that answer. My Torts professor pulled her fact patterns out of legal publications and tweaked them a bit - so, no, I knew the BLL cold, kept an open mind, and did my best to creatively apply law to fact. My Property professor generally focused on 5 small snippets of the class, but only one of those issues consistently reappeared on the exam, whereas the others seemed to rotate - so I took a hybrid approach of the above styles of preparation.
But how did I know all of this going in? Ding ding ding! I took every available exam that I could get my hands on, which is the best thing that anyone can do to prepare for law school exams, IMO.
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I agree with the other posters on here that pre writing an answer wouldn't make sense when you don't know what the facts are.zeth006 wrote:It depends. I had a 2L tell me about a past prof who would recycle tests from another school he used to teach at by simply substituting names/places/misc facts. Once he and his group figured out the pattern, they literally drafted a pre-written rubric and applied it to the exam.
Probably doesn't happen often, but worth noting.
the only exception, I think, would be where the tests are exactly the same each year. in my Civ Pro the Prof has used the same format for the last 10 year..only changing out the names and situations. I've prewritten an answer and plan on applying it come game day. while I fully know the material, this will just let me be more precise and specific and have fewer writing errors.
- vamedic03
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: Pre-Written Answers
I don't get why you need a paragraph explaining a rule and where it comes from. The statement of a rule should take a sentence. An exam is won and lost in the application, not in the rule statement. Remember, an exam cares less about the origin of a rule and more about the application of the rule. This isn't a legal brief/memo.dougroberts wrote: Except outlines are usually not full sentences or thoughts, but fragments and short rules. I'm talking about a full paragraph stating the rule from, say, a statute and then a case backing it up. Then, when this topic comes up on the exam (which you know it will if it is an important one), then you just copy/paste it in (or retype it in), then next paragraph would be a more specific rule if there is, and then apply/conclusion.
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pre-Written Answers
i'm doing this for one class, in which the professor explicitly asks for doctrinal background and for an evaluation of the current doctrine (and there are less than a dozen broad topics in the class). a good 2L friend of mine had the same professor last year and told me that pre-writing exam answers helped him immensely, but for most classes i think it's probably a waste of time.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login