Question about law school path towards CrimLaw - help!
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:08 pm
OK, I have a question that is probably best suited towards those who have completed law school or at least a fair majority of it.
Right now, I am first-term 1L and started out with 5 classes (plus a retarded 0-credit intro course) ConLaw, Ks I, Prop I, Crim, and Torts I. About 5-6 weeks in, I dropped ConLaw in the interest of having a 3-day weekend and more time for rest and also just having less to focus on for my first term. So, I'm down to 4 and I have not regretted that decision.
At any rate, I knew well before entering law school that my ultimate goal was to do criminal law (defense, particularly) and that rings true now, nearing completion of my first term. My favorite class is certainly Crim, even with a so-so professor. I also like Torts, I think because a lot of the laws/rules are similar or at least comparable. But, I definitely have a very clear understanding of everything covered in CrimLaw, and about 85% of Torts and I enjoy it probably the same ratio.
Now, Ks and Prop = nightmares. My Prop prof is the son of the school's founder (hello, nepotism) and though an awesome dude all-around, he's not that great of a lecturer. The good side is that he knows this and, as such, his curve for the final is very generous. I worry I'll fail, but that's another matter. I just HATE reading the cases.. I understand at least a good deal of the concepts.. but future interests (HATE/RAGE!!!), mortgages, wills, deeds, marketability.. all that stuff puts me to sleep.
Ks is similar for me, except the prof is AWESOME. He's very nice and very clear about what he expects us to know. But, that doesn't help too much. I generally have a very poor understanding when I read my assignments the night before, but feel better about them after he lectures. Despite even that, I can't stand Ks. The UCC confuses me, calculations for damages/remedies is often hard for me, and just the concepts are dry to me like those in property.
So, having said that, I arrive at my final question to you guys. I obviously have Ks II and Prop II and Torts II still to take. Torts, as mentioned, I won't mind at all. But, the other 2 are awful and another term of that stuff is depressing.. plus the class that will replace Crim is CivPro, which I am not that excited about at all. I mean, I know there are still courses left REGARDING criminal law like drunk driving, federal criminal law, crimpro, etc but it seems like there are way more courses geared towards and lean upon Ks, Prop, and Torts. I guess my question is if this is a bad sign for me or not? I'm only interested in the criminal (and to some degree Torts) stuff, but I know the rest of law school is very important to know in order to be a lawyer and, of course, material to passing the bar.
I'd really, REALLY appreciate it if any of you could give me some feedback and opinions on this. I mean, if this is indeed a loud warning siren to GTFO, then it'd be good to figure that out sooner rather than later.
Thanks VERY much in advance. Enjoy the weekend all.
Right now, I am first-term 1L and started out with 5 classes (plus a retarded 0-credit intro course) ConLaw, Ks I, Prop I, Crim, and Torts I. About 5-6 weeks in, I dropped ConLaw in the interest of having a 3-day weekend and more time for rest and also just having less to focus on for my first term. So, I'm down to 4 and I have not regretted that decision.
At any rate, I knew well before entering law school that my ultimate goal was to do criminal law (defense, particularly) and that rings true now, nearing completion of my first term. My favorite class is certainly Crim, even with a so-so professor. I also like Torts, I think because a lot of the laws/rules are similar or at least comparable. But, I definitely have a very clear understanding of everything covered in CrimLaw, and about 85% of Torts and I enjoy it probably the same ratio.
Now, Ks and Prop = nightmares. My Prop prof is the son of the school's founder (hello, nepotism) and though an awesome dude all-around, he's not that great of a lecturer. The good side is that he knows this and, as such, his curve for the final is very generous. I worry I'll fail, but that's another matter. I just HATE reading the cases.. I understand at least a good deal of the concepts.. but future interests (HATE/RAGE!!!), mortgages, wills, deeds, marketability.. all that stuff puts me to sleep.
Ks is similar for me, except the prof is AWESOME. He's very nice and very clear about what he expects us to know. But, that doesn't help too much. I generally have a very poor understanding when I read my assignments the night before, but feel better about them after he lectures. Despite even that, I can't stand Ks. The UCC confuses me, calculations for damages/remedies is often hard for me, and just the concepts are dry to me like those in property.
So, having said that, I arrive at my final question to you guys. I obviously have Ks II and Prop II and Torts II still to take. Torts, as mentioned, I won't mind at all. But, the other 2 are awful and another term of that stuff is depressing.. plus the class that will replace Crim is CivPro, which I am not that excited about at all. I mean, I know there are still courses left REGARDING criminal law like drunk driving, federal criminal law, crimpro, etc but it seems like there are way more courses geared towards and lean upon Ks, Prop, and Torts. I guess my question is if this is a bad sign for me or not? I'm only interested in the criminal (and to some degree Torts) stuff, but I know the rest of law school is very important to know in order to be a lawyer and, of course, material to passing the bar.
I'd really, REALLY appreciate it if any of you could give me some feedback and opinions on this. I mean, if this is indeed a loud warning siren to GTFO, then it'd be good to figure that out sooner rather than later.
Thanks VERY much in advance. Enjoy the weekend all.