Is this a bad strategy?
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:22 am
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=131612
Explain. I've been using canned briefs to supplement my casebook readings and my own personal briefs when I actually write them are maybe 5-8 sentences long. Nothing wrong with using outside supplements for class--my prop professor is ridiculously abstruse in his lectures that I rarely get anything from my notes for my outlines, 2 of which I'm basing off of older ones that were extremely well written.PunjabiLower wrote:I think I am having a bit of trouble in law school...I just don't know a good process of learning. I currently don't pay much attention in class...and I haven't briefed a single case yet. I go to 90%+ of the classes(I don't pay attention...but I use the professor's powerpoint slides in my notes), I do all the casebook reading, get canned briefs for cases I don't understand, and use good 2L and 3L outlines(from the same professor) for studying. I am also relying on the EnE's and Dressler...and write anything I learn from the supps on the side of the 2L/3L outlines. However, my main focus is using the 2L and 3L outlines for understanding the classes. They go really well with the class because each outline is from the same professor I have. Thoughts? Should I brief cases or is it too late for that? The outlines I am using have the facts of each case and the legal rule/holding embedded into the relevant section of the outline...is this enough?
Also, I have been reading GTM and LSC throughout the semester and plan to read GTM twice before the semester is over.
PunjabiLower wrote:I think I am having a bit of trouble in law school...I just don't know a good process of learning. I currently don't pay much attention in class...and I haven't briefed a single case yet. I go to 90%+ of the classes(I don't pay attention...but I use the professor's powerpoint slides in my notes), I do all the casebook reading, get canned briefs for cases I don't understand, and use good 2L and 3L outlines(from the same professor) for studying. I am also relying on the EnE's and Dressler...and write anything I learn from the supps on the side of the 2L/3L outlines. However, my main focus is using the 2L and 3L outlines for understanding the classes. They go really well with the class because each outline is from the same professor I have. Thoughts? Should I brief cases or is it too late for that? The outlines I am using have the facts of each case and the legal rule/holding embedded into the relevant section of the outline...is this enough?
Also, I have been reading GTM and LSC throughout the semester and plan to read GTM twice before the semester is over.