Page 1 of 1
New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:11 pm
by top15
Maybe, worth a shot? No law degree, yet can take bar exam...
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:15 pm
by romothesavior
Wikipedia says you need at least one year of law school experience to do this in the state of New York.
Also lolwut
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:18 pm
by Leeroy Jenkins
I wasn't aware we were still in the 1800's.
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:19 pm
by top15
Yep, one year. Still saves some $$$ at least...
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:20 pm
by eandy
Don't do it. Nobody would hire you, and having your own firm just starting out is pretty much instafail.
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:21 pm
by nealric
Good luck finding a firm that is OK with sponsoring you
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:22 pm
by Fark-o-vision
Don't come to a site specifically dedicated to the pursuit of a top law degree and expect anyone to tell you this is a good idea.
Flame or moron.
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:23 pm
by jayn3
not saying i condone this, but aren't bar prep classes open to anyone willing to pay? v curious how this turns out.
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:25 pm
by top15
Just bar prep is not enough for bar admission
Re: New York: Law School vs "Reading law" in the law office
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:57 am
by romothesavior
Leeroy Jenkins wrote:I wasn't aware we were still in the 1800's.
This.
What a stupid thread.