Anyone Else Ready To Give Up On Grades?
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 10:06 pm
Edit: Deleted.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=118259
Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
Not true....if you see a copy of the main campus transcript, and not the one from Boalt, HHs and Hs are listed as As, Ps are Bs, sub-Ps are Cs, and no credit is F.Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
Don't put much stock in the official transcripts, I've seen them too. Employers who know Boalt don't care to see them. They want to see the Hs and Ps. I'll stick by my grading analysisIzziesGal wrote:Not true....if you see a copy of the main campus transcript, and not the one from Boalt, HHs and Hs are listed as As, Ps are Bs, sub-Ps are Cs, and no credit is F.Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
What class did you get Honors in? I just got my crim grade from Boalt back so far, and that's it. I wish I had more grades to talk about. And yes - I give up trying to figure it out as well.
I'm at Berkeley. Virtually every student seems really smart. I've only heard of maybe a half dozen sub-Ps throughout the whole 2012 class. Don't know who got them.A'nold wrote:Do you guys know of any seemingly smart students that have gotten a sub-P?
I know of one who sub-p'd last semester in Ks and one in property, but that's it. Like Drake said, everyone seems brilliant. Not intimidating at all.Drake014 wrote:I'm at Berkeley. Virtually every student seems really smart. I've only heard of maybe a half dozen sub-Ps throughout the whole 2012 class. Don't know who got them.A'nold wrote:Do you guys know of any seemingly smart students that have gotten a sub-P?
THis is not true because:Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
HH = 5 pts, H = 3, and P = 2. At least this is what some grades obsessed, Order of the Coif gunners tell me all the time.truevines wrote:THis is not true because:Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
top 10% = HH
top 10-40% = H
the rest 60% = P
This is not a Gaussian distribution or whatever.
And you have no way to compare to two students as precisely as other schools do.
E.g.
A) HH + P : he could be top 10% + bottom 10%; while
B) H + P: could be top 30% + top 50%
and
C) P+P: could be top 45% + top 45%
Boalt's system encourages you to put all your eggs in one basket.
--
I don't know how they calculate the order of COIF or the ranking for clerkship.
Putting all eggs in one basket is a terrible strategy, grades are fairly arbitrary, there is no amount of work you can do to guarantee yourself anything, plenty of people study a ton and get all Ps. The best strategy is to give a good effort on each exam.truevines wrote:THis is not true because:Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
top 10% = HH
top 10-40% = H
the rest 60% = P
This is not a Gaussian distribution or whatever.
And you have no way to compare to two students as precisely as other schools do.
E.g.
A) HH + P : he could be top 10% + bottom 10%; while
B) H + P: could be top 30% + top 50%
and
C) P+P: could be top 45% + top 45%
Boalt's system encourages you to put all your eggs in one basket.
--
I don't know how they calculate the order of COIF or the ranking for clerkship.
+1. I think it's a bad idea to focus all your energy on X class and let the other ones slide. There is no guarantee that you will get the HH or even an H in that class, and then you will have lost out on possibly getting honors in your other classes.Boalt1L wrote:Putting all eggs in one basket is a terrible strategy, grades are fairly arbitrary, there is no amount of work you can do to guarantee yourself anything, plenty of people study a ton and get all Ps. The best strategy is to give a good effort on each exam.truevines wrote:THis is not true because:Drake014 wrote:Don't let Berkeley fool you.Aqualibrium wrote:At least you don't have real grades to worry aboutRegardless, I generally agree.
HH = A
H = B
P = C
Sub-Pass = D
They just change what its called to make you feel better.
top 10% = HH
top 10-40% = H
the rest 60% = P
This is not a Gaussian distribution or whatever.
And you have no way to compare to two students as precisely as other schools do.
E.g.
A) HH + P : he could be top 10% + bottom 10%; while
B) H + P: could be top 30% + top 50%
and
C) P+P: could be top 45% + top 45%
Boalt's system encourages you to put all your eggs in one basket.
--
I don't know how they calculate the order of COIF or the ranking for clerkship.