Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=117599
You should re-read your original question, because it's utterly incomprehensible. In fact, it is so incomprehensible nobody else has bothered to respond, because they don't understand what you're asking.DNA1984 wrote:I'm not sure what you mean? are you not familiar with civ pro topics?
Maybe you should read the goddamn rules of civil procedureDNA1984 wrote:The damn prof mentioned the "standard" as claim or defense about 20 times in class and never said anything about it included non priveleged info. I know it's implicit, but it threw me off b/c I wasn't sure wtf it had to do with the "standard" per se. Maybe the scope... but no standard end of rant!
Maybe you should not be such a dick and get off your computer for a few minutes and learn some people skills. 16K posts, jesus christ man, ever think that if you weren't such an asshole you wouldn't be restricted to internet forums in making social contact with others...Leeroy Jenkins wrote:Maybe you should read the goddamn rules of civil procedureDNA1984 wrote:The damn prof mentioned the "standard" as claim or defense about 20 times in class and never said anything about it included non priveleged info. I know it's implicit, but it threw me off b/c I wasn't sure wtf it had to do with the "standard" per se. Maybe the scope... but no standard end of rant!
Maybe you're the one who should learn some people skills, instead of getting your panties in a bunch because someone went out of their way to help you. Ever think that if you weren't such a dickwad someone would have pointed out the Federal rules of civ pro to you earlier so you could use it as a study aidDNA1984 wrote:Maybe you should not be such a dick and get off your computer for a few minutes and learn some people skills. 16K posts, jesus christ man, ever think that if you weren't such an asshole you wouldn't be restricted to internet forums in making social contact with others...
You're right, I have no people skills. I have no friends that would have pointed that out to me. Thanks internet friend. Next time, I'll read the "goddamn civil rules of procedure."Leeroy Jenkins wrote:Maybe you're the one who should learn some people skills, instead of getting your panties in a bunch because someone went out of their way to help you. Ever think that if you weren't such a dickwad someone would have pointed out the Federal rules of civ pro to you earlier so you could use it as a study aidDNA1984 wrote:Maybe you should not be such a dick and get off your computer for a few minutes and learn some people skills. 16K posts, jesus christ man, ever think that if you weren't such an asshole you wouldn't be restricted to internet forums in making social contact with others...
ggocat wrote:This thread was fun.
(: My work here is doneseespotrun wrote:ggocat wrote:This thread was fun.
c) the legal profession needs higher standards.DNA1984 wrote:Or maybe they just don't know the answer...
This is what my question on the test was.
The "standard" for attorney managed discovery is:
a)claim or defense
b)claim or defense and non priveleged
What do you guys think it is?
tcrDNA1984 wrote:Maybe you should not be such a dick and get off your computer for a few minutes and learn some people skills. 16K posts, jesus christ man, ever think that if you weren't such an asshole you wouldn't be restricted to internet forums in making social contact with others...Leeroy Jenkins wrote:Maybe you should read the goddamn rules of civil procedureDNA1984 wrote:The damn prof mentioned the "standard" as claim or defense about 20 times in class and never said anything about it included non priveleged info. I know it's implicit, but it threw me off b/c I wasn't sure wtf it had to do with the "standard" per se. Maybe the scope... but no standard end of rant!