question about ranking
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:37 pm
I got a 3.2 as a 1L, first semester of law school. where does that fall rankings wise? is it within the top 30%? I go to Chapman law school
Top Law Schools
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
question about ranking Forum
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103932
Page 1 of 1
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:37 pm
lol
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:27 pm
edit: n/m
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:28 pm
Well apparently Chapman's curve is 2.8 median. Someone else will have to fill you in on where that puts you wrt class rank
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:54 pm
edit: n/m
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:51 am
Yea dont have that information as of yet. Wanted top 10% so I can lose the loans for next year. Well, maybe I'll get a 3.8 Spring semester 
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:04 pm
NALP (http://www.nalplawschoolsonline.org/) Says Chapman's 2008 Graduating Class was:
Top 10%: 3.381
Top 25%: 3.092
Top 33%: 3.016
Top 50%: 2.869
Top 75%: 2.647
Top 10%: 3.381
Top 25%: 3.092
Top 33%: 3.016
Top 50%: 2.869
Top 75%: 2.647
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:14 pm
nahgems wrote:NALP (http://www.nalplawschoolsonline.org/) Says Chapman's 2008 Graduating Class was:
Top 10%: 3.381
Top 25%: 3.092
Top 33%: 3.016
Top 50%: 2.869
Top 75%: 2.647
that actually had some good info on it, thanks for that link
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:30 pm
edit: n/m
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:31 pm
thesealocust wrote:Careful of graduating class #s. At UVA, our curve is 3.3 even in small classes so the graduating class doesn't look much different from the class after 1L. At other school where seminars and such can give out As like candy, threshold GPAs can jump a substantial amount by graduation.
duly noted, good call
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:03 pm
Rude.apper123 wrote:lol
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:11 pm
i lol'd because he provided no historical data, and, more importantly, didn't even tell us what the curve wasannapavlova wrote:Rude.apper123 wrote:lol
but yeah it was probably rude
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:21 pm
Or perhaps I'm rude for assuming you'd be lol-ing at the particular law school...Hmm. That might be ruder.apper123 wrote:i lol'd because he provided no historical data, and, more importantly, didn't even tell us what the curve wasannapavlova wrote:Rude.apper123 wrote:lol
but yeah it was probably rude
Re: question about ranking
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:41 pm
oh gosh no (seriously) i would never do thatannapavlova wrote:Or perhaps I'm rude for assuming you'd be lol-ing at the particular law school...Hmm. That might be ruder.apper123 wrote:i lol'd because he provided no historical data, and, more importantly, didn't even tell us what the curve wasannapavlova wrote:Rude.apper123 wrote:lol
but yeah it was probably rude
sorry if it came across that way