Re: Unemployed Editor in Chief of Chicago kent Law Review
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:37 am
I bet a big reason this kid doesn't have a job is because he's a shit interviewer, he really comes off as an entitled douche in the article
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=145462
Do not encourage that nonsense, even in jest.seespotrun wrote:Sounds bulletproof to me.BaronDetroit wrote:You bring customer oriented service customized to the particuliar needs of the client. Some lawyers treat clients as if they are trash. Certainly, another key is to launch lawsuits and not be afraid to bring actions that a more experienced lawyer would dismiss as non viable. The thrill and aggressiveness to ensure your client gets richly compensated is the lynchpin of my theory.
You're an obvious troll, there's a mild danger someone reading might actually believe something you say, so... you're gone.BaronDetroit wrote:You bring customer oriented service customized to the particuliar needs of the client. Some lawyers treat clients as if they are trash. Certainly, another key is to launch lawsuits and not be afraid to bring actions that a more experienced lawyer would dismiss as non viable. The thrill and aggressiveness to ensure your client gets richly compensated is the lynchpin of my theory.
dr123 wrote:I bet a big reason this kid doesn't have a job is because he's a shit interviewer, he really comes off as an entitled douche in the article
vanwinkle wrote:You're an obvious troll, there's a mild danger someone reading might actually believe something you say, so... you're gone.BaronDetroit wrote:You bring customer oriented service customized to the particuliar needs of the client. Some lawyers treat clients as if they are trash. Certainly, another key is to launch lawsuits and not be afraid to bring actions that a more experienced lawyer would dismiss as non viable. The thrill and aggressiveness to ensure your client gets richly compensated is the lynchpin of my theory.
I didn't think he was real, but I figured i'd humor him anyways just in case.Aqualibrium wrote:vanwinkle wrote:You're an obvious troll, there's a mild danger someone reading might actually believe something you say, so... you're gone.BaronDetroit wrote:You bring customer oriented service customized to the particuliar needs of the client. Some lawyers treat clients as if they are trash. Certainly, another key is to launch lawsuits and not be afraid to bring actions that a more experienced lawyer would dismiss as non viable. The thrill and aggressiveness to ensure your client gets richly compensated is the lynchpin of my theory.
I think people were actually believing it. I can't believe people actually tried to argue with that gibberish.
I found this interview/thread fairly inspiring.Aqualibrium wrote:dr123 wrote:I bet a big reason this kid doesn't have a job is because he's a shit interviewer, he really comes off as an entitled douche in the article
Most people are either shit interviewers or passing interviewers...The odds are 90% that you fall in to one of those two categories as well. The article acknowledged that the letter he wrote was tongue in cheek.
The big reason this kid is unemployed is because he is top 34-5% at Kent and wants major firm work.
Well that's some bullshit.vanwinkle wrote:You're an obvious troll, there's a mild danger someone reading might actually believe something you say, so... you're gone.BaronDetroit wrote:You bring customer oriented service customized to the particuliar needs of the client. Some lawyers treat clients as if they are trash. Certainly, another key is to launch lawsuits and not be afraid to bring actions that a more experienced lawyer would dismiss as non viable. The thrill and aggressiveness to ensure your client gets richly compensated is the lynchpin of my theory.
TITCRJusticeHarlan wrote:FRCP 11(c)BaronDetroit wrote:Nobody has told me why this theory is not viable: Go to any ABA accredited law school and become a lawyer arising out of the juris doctorate. Simplify the way in which lawyers make money. Become very ignorant and simply find clients who want to obtain large quantities of money. Find these claimants and launch lawsuit after lawsuit knowing that clients nor judges care what your school was or grades were. Its not easy- nothing is. But until a new lawyer fails at this theory I see no reason to ever apply for any jobs.
smokyroom26 wrote:TITCRJusticeHarlan wrote:FRCP 11(c)BaronDetroit wrote:Nobody has told me why this theory is not viable: Go to any ABA accredited law school and become a lawyer arising out of the juris doctorate. Simplify the way in which lawyers make money. Become very ignorant and simply find clients who want to obtain large quantities of money. Find these claimants and launch lawsuit after lawsuit knowing that clients nor judges care what your school was or grades were. Its not easy- nothing is. But until a new lawyer fails at this theory I see no reason to ever apply for any jobs.
Thanks for the update. Do you know him?helfer snooterbagon wrote:This guy scored. He is now at Kirkland.
http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm ... emID=10170