Top Law Schools

..

You should probably post the question

Yeah. Post the question.

(Not that I aced Property or any class at all )

..

bhangra23 wrote:I would rather PM b/w someone that did really well, plz PM if u r willing to look at a hypo and you did well in property. Sorry but if u didn't do well, well you know....

Yeah, if you didn't ace the course overall, it's unlikely that you'll be able to answer this super complex hypo he got within the first couple weeks of class.

Kabuo wrote:

bhangra23 wrote:I would rather PM b/w someone that did really well, plz PM if u r willing to look at a hypo and you did well in property. Sorry but if u didn't do well, well you know....

Yeah, if you didn't ace the course overall, it's unlikely that you'll be able to answer this super complex hypo he got within the first couple weeks of class.

+1. Plus, this hypo is probably so ingenious he needs to keep it close to his chest, lest be preempted by Harv. L. Rev.

I really want to know what this question is that only someone who aced property can even read it. I only got an A- so clearly I am not worthy of even attempting to help

You only have 39 posts so surely your anonymity can't be a major issue. You can't just post the question so others can learn?

The answer is something like: property was developed over a long period of time so what you learn in the course seems like, indeed is, a mash-up of a bunch of incongruous doctrines.

Answer may also be, "the implied warranty of habitability," or, more like, "it depends. one could interpret party A's actions to be x, but from the viewpoint of party B, they also appear to be y. Blah blah blah, a judge probably would think they're x."

As you can tell, I aced that shit.

johndhi wrote:The answer is something like: property was developed over a long period of time so what you learn in the course seems like, indeed is, a mash-up of a bunch of incongruous doctrines.

Answer may also be, "the implied warranty of habitability," or, more like, "it depends. one could interpret party A's actions to be x, but from the viewpoint of party B, they also appear to be y. Blah blah blah, a judge probably would think they're x."

As you can tell, I aced that shit.

This makes me feel a lot better about property; it's exactly how I've felt since classes started. Every other class makes sense, but I have no idea the direction the property prof is trying to take us.