Share Your Thoughts -- Chicago v. Columbia
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 9:55 am
Hey all:
Would really appreciate some TLS wisdom right about now. Have deadlines today to submit deposits at Chicago and Columbia and it's hard for me to decide which one to choose. Ideally after law school I would like to do BigLaw in DC, preferably litigation, but I realize that's a bit premature at this point as I may be perfectly happy doing transactional/corporate work. I really like Tax so that's an option as well, and am patent-bar eligible so I could also go into IP. Again everything is kind of up in the air right now since I don't think I can adequately decide on a practice area after one year of doctrinal coursework, which complicates my decision. Ideally I want the degree that will give me the most opportunities with top BigLaw firms and that will be the most portable and allow me to get a job anywhere in the country (may want to go to SF/northern Cal. if I decide to go into IP).
Some things to consider:
[*]Post-law school I would like to do BigLaw in DC, NY or possibly northern Cal. if I choose to go into IP. Have zero ties to other parts of the country other than mid-Atlantic/Northeast region.
[*]Neither school offers need-based aid, so almost entire COA would need to be financed through loans at both. The difference in their estimated budgets seems to be about $6k per year, so Columbia would be about $15k more expensive over the long-term.
[*]I'm not at all interested in working in Chicago after law-school.
[*]I have friends in NYC but don't know anyone in Chicago and have never even visited the city, so I would be kind of on my own in a totally new city.
[*]I would prefer to be at a school where transfer students can easily integrate into the larger student body instead of just being their own little group, and ideally at a school that facilitates this transition through events, etc.
Which one should I choose? Any feedback would be immensely appreciated!
Would really appreciate some TLS wisdom right about now. Have deadlines today to submit deposits at Chicago and Columbia and it's hard for me to decide which one to choose. Ideally after law school I would like to do BigLaw in DC, preferably litigation, but I realize that's a bit premature at this point as I may be perfectly happy doing transactional/corporate work. I really like Tax so that's an option as well, and am patent-bar eligible so I could also go into IP. Again everything is kind of up in the air right now since I don't think I can adequately decide on a practice area after one year of doctrinal coursework, which complicates my decision. Ideally I want the degree that will give me the most opportunities with top BigLaw firms and that will be the most portable and allow me to get a job anywhere in the country (may want to go to SF/northern Cal. if I decide to go into IP).
Some things to consider:
[*]Post-law school I would like to do BigLaw in DC, NY or possibly northern Cal. if I choose to go into IP. Have zero ties to other parts of the country other than mid-Atlantic/Northeast region.
[*]Neither school offers need-based aid, so almost entire COA would need to be financed through loans at both. The difference in their estimated budgets seems to be about $6k per year, so Columbia would be about $15k more expensive over the long-term.
[*]I'm not at all interested in working in Chicago after law-school.
[*]I have friends in NYC but don't know anyone in Chicago and have never even visited the city, so I would be kind of on my own in a totally new city.
[*]I would prefer to be at a school where transfer students can easily integrate into the larger student body instead of just being their own little group, and ideally at a school that facilitates this transition through events, etc.
Which one should I choose? Any feedback would be immensely appreciated!