LOL at people who take $$$ then transfer for sticker
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:41 pm
Why even take the scholarship money in return for reduced chances of getting a good job? When you trade it back by transfering. Just LOL
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=230848
(wants to pay 150k for 2 years at Berkley)heavoldgotjuice wrote:Fuck you
What makes you think this is the choice? I can't imagine there are may transfers who end up at a school they got into/could have gotten into the first time.Desert Fox wrote:Why even take the scholarship money in return for reduced chances of getting a good job? When you trade it back by transfering. Just LOL
Because typically you get into a better school than you get $$$ at.BVest wrote:What makes you think this is the choice? I can't imagine there are may transfers who end up at a school they got into/could have gotten into the first time.Desert Fox wrote:Why even take the scholarship money in return for reduced chances of getting a good job? When you trade it back by transfering. Just LOL
Desert Fox wrote:Because typically you get into a better school than you get $$$ at.BVest wrote:What makes you think this is the choice? I can't imagine there are may transfers who end up at a school they got into/could have gotten into the first time.Desert Fox wrote:Why even take the scholarship money in return for reduced chances of getting a good job? When you trade it back by transfering. Just LOL
That's probably why I got in the first timeBVest wrote:Desert Fox wrote:Because typically you get into a better school than you get $$$ at.BVest wrote:What makes you think this is the choice? I can't imagine there are may transfers who end up at a school they got into/could have gotten into the first time.Desert Fox wrote:Why even take the scholarship money in return for reduced chances of getting a good job? When you trade it back by transfering. Just LOL
You're right. Your logic is clearly flawless. I stand corrected.
I appreciate this thread if its purpose was to call out heavold.rad lulz wrote:LOLRuxin1 wrote:(wants to pay 150k for 2 years at Berkley)heavoldgotjuice wrote:Fuck you
(starts thread asking what biglawl money buys)
KD35 wrote: I appreciate this thread if its purpose was to call out heavold.
+1brazleton wrote:Wait, you save 1/3 of COA, get a low-risk chance to see how you compete on law school exams, and then get to do OCI at a superior school. Yeah, what a terrible idea. Come on DF, this is dumber than usual.
Thanks for your contribution.rad lulz wrote:LOL
Only disagreement is that it's not really a low-risk chance to see how you compete in law school; you might compete less well than you hope, in which case you probably still have your scholarship. The crucial point, though, is that by transferring you graduate with less debt than you would have had you attended at sticker for all three years, and you get a diploma from a better school. In most cases you do lose your shot at graduating with honors however.brazleton wrote:Wait, you save 1/3 of COA, get a low-risk chance to see how you compete on law school exams, and then get to do OCI at a superior school. Yeah, what a terrible idea. Come on DF, this is dumber than usual.
Taking a scholly at low ranked school isn't low risk. You have like a 85% shot at getting stuck with a career in shitlaw.whelmer wrote:Yeah I fail to see how this is worth an LOL but taking sticker for all three years is not.brazleton wrote:Wait, you save 1/3 of COA, get a low-risk chance to see how you compete on law school exams, and then get to do OCI at a superior school. Yeah, what a terrible idea. Come on DF, this is dumber than usual.
Plus, with the different loan repayment options available these days, people don't necessarily need to be as constrained by the loan issue as before.
Really? As dumb as coming to the transfer board for what appears to be the sole purpose of talk shit about transfers?Desert Fox wrote: Unfortunately, these posts are just as dumb as I expect from TLS on topic posters.
How can you say that low-ranked schools involve an 85% risk of getting a career in shitlaw, then say that transferring leads to only a marginal increase in career prospects? Do 3/4 of graduates of T14/T20 schools go into shitlaw? How worthwhile are those OCI connections from the regional school if they are in "shitlaw". Your points are all over the place. Are you of the opinion that someone who is accepted to a T14 with no scholarship and to a TT with scholarship should choose the TT? Why the animosity toward transfers? Even if these decisions should be made based solely on economic thinking, there are cases where transferring carries advantages.Desert Fox wrote:Taking a scholly at low ranked school isn't low risk. You have like a 85% shot at getting stuck with a career in shitlaw.whelmer wrote:Yeah I fail to see how this is worth an LOL but taking sticker for all three years is not.brazleton wrote:Wait, you save 1/3 of COA, get a low-risk chance to see how you compete on law school exams, and then get to do OCI at a superior school. Yeah, what a terrible idea. Come on DF, this is dumber than usual.
Plus, with the different loan repayment options available these days, people don't necessarily need to be as constrained by the loan issue as before.
Second, once you get good grades at a regional school, you already have the OCI connections you need. There are some situations where the local schools have no OCI, but that's pretty damn rare unless you were really retarded at took a scholly in some rando market you don't want to work at.
Transferring is a waste because you no longer need to the boost of the superior OCI. Taking the scholly is trading the higher risk for more money. But transfering is trading a bunch of money for marginally increased prospects. It's retarded.
Unfortunately, these posts are just as dumb as I expect from TLS on topic posters.
it's cuz once you have the grades to transfer, you're no longer in the 85% of kids who will likely get shitlaw. At the non-T14's, most of the class have bad prospects and a small percentage at the top usually have great prospects, unless the school is so shitty that no one has good prospects or something.whelmer wrote: How can you say that low-ranked schools involve an 85% risk of getting a career in shitlaw, then say that transferring leads to only a marginal increase in career prospects?