Asking a Prof. for a Recommendation
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:25 pm
So in the next month or two, I need to ask profs for transfer recommendations (I'm thinking of doing EA @ GULC if you're wondering what the rush is). Having a tough time coming up with a reason for transferring other than "I want to go to a better school" in case they ask.
The Profs: Of the 2 profs I will be asking, 1 is a graduate of the school I go to and has taught here for 30 years, the other went to Harvard and is an assistant dean here; hence I would assume they both might have stronger attachments to my school than the average prof, and thus the reason I'm freaking out about ensuring I give them a reason they will respect. (I'd rather stick with these 2 profs though since I know they both like me and I got an A in both their classes.)
So far I've come up with (in order of which ones I like the most):
1. I'm an international student and there isn't any support at my current school for international students. All of the international students are LLM students (I'm pretty sure I'm the only international JD student), so there isn't any information or student services that give me any leads on what I can do with my JD outside the US. Problem: Sounds a bit like I'm dissing my current school's administration, and seems a bit close to the "I want to go to a better school" reason.
2. I want to move out of city/out of state. This is true; I will be applying to schools mostly outside my current city and/or state, and if given the choice between 2 equally good schools I would go with the out of state school. Problem: I do intend to apply to 1 or 2 schools within my current city, which detracts from the genuineness of my reason. Also, I wouldn't want the prof to write a recommendation that I send to a law school within the city that mentions my desire to move out of the city.
3. The "trying to negotiate a scholarship out of my current school" reason suggested in Arrow's article. However, honestly I disagree with Arrow's assertion that it is a reason that most profs will understand. It seems like you are asking profs (in my case, with attachments to my school) to help you extract money out of the administration by 'playing hardball', which seems equally as ignoble as just saying "I think will have better employment prospects graduating from [insert name of transfer school] than [insert name of current school]."
Maybe I can use a combination of 1 and 2? I dunno. What do you guys think? Am I tripping out too much about this?
The Profs: Of the 2 profs I will be asking, 1 is a graduate of the school I go to and has taught here for 30 years, the other went to Harvard and is an assistant dean here; hence I would assume they both might have stronger attachments to my school than the average prof, and thus the reason I'm freaking out about ensuring I give them a reason they will respect. (I'd rather stick with these 2 profs though since I know they both like me and I got an A in both their classes.)
So far I've come up with (in order of which ones I like the most):
1. I'm an international student and there isn't any support at my current school for international students. All of the international students are LLM students (I'm pretty sure I'm the only international JD student), so there isn't any information or student services that give me any leads on what I can do with my JD outside the US. Problem: Sounds a bit like I'm dissing my current school's administration, and seems a bit close to the "I want to go to a better school" reason.
2. I want to move out of city/out of state. This is true; I will be applying to schools mostly outside my current city and/or state, and if given the choice between 2 equally good schools I would go with the out of state school. Problem: I do intend to apply to 1 or 2 schools within my current city, which detracts from the genuineness of my reason. Also, I wouldn't want the prof to write a recommendation that I send to a law school within the city that mentions my desire to move out of the city.
3. The "trying to negotiate a scholarship out of my current school" reason suggested in Arrow's article. However, honestly I disagree with Arrow's assertion that it is a reason that most profs will understand. It seems like you are asking profs (in my case, with attachments to my school) to help you extract money out of the administration by 'playing hardball', which seems equally as ignoble as just saying "I think will have better employment prospects graduating from [insert name of transfer school] than [insert name of current school]."
Maybe I can use a combination of 1 and 2? I dunno. What do you guys think? Am I tripping out too much about this?