What are your thoughts on the Troutman Pepper and Locke Lord merger discussions?
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 8:37 pm
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=315128
The PEP for both of these firms is over $1 million. A merger between the two would generate revenue of over $1.6 billion, putting it in the top 30 of firms. Sure this isn’t a merger between Cravath and Kirkland, but it’s these kind of soft preening schoolboy comments that make people roll their eyes at TLS.
PEP for each firm barely cracks the top 100 which is probably why no one really cares.bajablast wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:29 pmThe PEP for both of these firms is over $1 million. A merger between the two would generate revenue of over $1.6 billion, putting it in the top 30 of firms. Sure this isn’t a merger between Cravath and Kirkland, but it’s these kind of soft preening schoolboy comments that make people roll their eyes at TLS.
They also aren't topically relevant - like at all - i can't think of any interesting case or business deal in the last 20 years where either one of these firms was involved.Moneytrees wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:08 pmPEP for each firm barely cracks the top 100 which is probably why no one really cares.bajablast wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:29 pmThe PEP for both of these firms is over $1 million. A merger between the two would generate revenue of over $1.6 billion, putting it in the top 30 of firms. Sure this isn’t a merger between Cravath and Kirkland, but it’s these kind of soft preening schoolboy comments that make people roll their eyes at TLS.
why don't you kick the discussion off then to supplement your drive-by OP consisting entirely of a hyperlink and a nonspecific questionAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 6:18 pmI’m OP. I wanted to say this, but didn’t want to start a fight. Thank you
It does seem like there is less and less room for the mid-size regional firm like Locke Lord out there. They all seem to be either merging with larger firms or going under (see Stroock). I think most institutional clients have much more of a national mindset these days and even if clients don't actually need national-level service, having a larger firm may be important for branding purposes. These mid-size firms have to have all of the institutional apparatus as the mega firms, but benefit less from the economies of scale. They can't run as lean as boutiques can.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:54 amI'll bite. In my practice area in a non-NY/DC but major market, I used to think of Pepper Hamilton and Locke Lord in the same vein. Both do high volume commoditized work with a relatively good reputation for budget minded clients. Nothing notable, but not cut rate/bad, either.
Despite their lack of headline-making matters, I do find this merger talk interesting. Historically, small/medium firms were happy to do this sort of low value commoditized work with much lower profits than their larger biglaw brethren. But I think there's a shift to try to (1) increase leverage and (2) take advantage of economies of scale to close the gap (at least somewhat). This would be the second major merger in a few years for Troutman Pepper (remember, it used to be Troutman Sanders and Pepper Hamilton), but it's not clear to me the last one worked out great (their revenue/headcount has been relatively stagnant). Regardless, I would certainly be concerned if I were a partner at either with a smaller book of business.