Page 1 of 2

Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:04 am
by Anonymous User
anyone have any recent intel on the place? Thinking about a move!

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 1:35 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:04 am
anyone have any recent intel on the place? Thinking about a move!
Probably the most up and coming complex litigation boutique in NYC right now. I wouldn't at all be surprised if it rivals Susman within a few years

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:20 am
by Anonymous User
Came off as weirdos in my interview then I didn't get an offer, maybe I'm the weirdo?

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
by Anonymous User
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:00 am
by Anonymous User
How does it compare to BSF/Quinn? Worse hours? Better opportunities?

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:27 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:00 am
How does it compare to BSF/Quinn? Worse hours? Better opportunities?
BSF and Quinn are biglaw, so yeah. All else equal, better hours and better opportunities. But the standard caveat applies that it depends on the partners you're working for, the clients, and the specific matters.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:05 pm
by Anonymous User
Any thoughts on how David Elsberg's departure will affect the firm's outlook?

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 1:59 pm
by Anonymous User
The firm may be collapsing. One of the founding partners just left: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business- ... er-elsberg

Proceed with caution. I have also heard pretty bad things. They may be similar to Quinn in many respects, but they are a much smaller firm, so it is not necessarily possible to escape bad partners...

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:00 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:27 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:00 am
How does it compare to BSF/Quinn? Worse hours? Better opportunities?
BSF and Quinn are biglaw, so yeah. All else equal, better hours and better opportunities. But the standard caveat applies that it depends on the partners you're working for, the clients, and the specific matters.
Hours are much worse than Quinn. They took a few of the most extreme workaholics from Quinn and built a whole firm around them..

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:19 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:27 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:00 am
How does it compare to BSF/Quinn? Worse hours? Better opportunities?
BSF and Quinn are biglaw, so yeah. All else equal, better hours and better opportunities. But the standard caveat applies that it depends on the partners you're working for, the clients, and the specific matters.

BSF is not big law.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:08 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.
These two are not in the same league of selectivity.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:57 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:08 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.
These two are not in the same league of selectivity.
Did the comment you're replying to imply otherwise?

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:48 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:08 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.
These two are not in the same league of selectivity.
I wouldn't go that far. I'd say the top tier of boutiques is Susman, Kellogg, and Bartlit, the best boutiques in their respective markets. Selendy is in the tier just below, along with Molo, Hueston, and some others. It's still very reputable, just not the top choice for clerks with the grades to go anywhere they please.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:09 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:48 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:08 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.
These two are not in the same league of selectivity.
I wouldn't go that far. I'd say the top tier of boutiques is Susman, Kellogg, and Bartlit, the best boutiques in their respective markets. Selendy is in the tier just below, along with Molo, Hueston, and some others. It's still very reputable, just not the top choice for clerks with the grades to go anywhere they please.
Would you say Wilkinson Stekloff and Selendy are on the same level?

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:22 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:09 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:48 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:08 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:29 am
It's an elite litigation boutique that's not quite as prestigious as Susman Godfrey (the crown jewel of litigation boutiques), but is still very well respected.
These two are not in the same league of selectivity.
I wouldn't go that far. I'd say the top tier of boutiques is Susman, Kellogg, and Bartlit, the best boutiques in their respective markets. Selendy is in the tier just below, along with Molo, Hueston, and some others. It's still very reputable, just not the top choice for clerks with the grades to go anywhere they please.
Would you say Wilkinson Stekloff and Selendy are on the same level?
Yes, I put Wilkinson in that very next tier also. It's a reputable boutique with a superstar name partner, but it has not yet become a household name to the point where it would survive, unchanged, if Beth Wilkinson retired. Susman has already had several succesful leadership handoffs, and at Kellogg and Bartlit the name partners have begun to step back and hand the reins over to a new generation of stars they helped train.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 9:22 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 1:35 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:04 am
anyone have any recent intel on the place? Thinking about a move!
Probably the most up and coming complex litigation boutique in NYC right now. I wouldn't at all be surprised if it rivals Susman within a few years
Not sure this is a good or helpful comparison for people thinking about working at one or the other. My understanding is that Selendy's leverage ratio looks a lot more like a normal biglaw shop and the work associates do is pretty similar as well. Think: larger teams, more associates per case, etc.

Contrast that with Susman, where the staffing is incredibly lean (often just 1 partner/1 associate) and associates are taking depositions, etc, within a few months of starting.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:04 pm
by Anonymous User
Selendy is certainly not as selective as Molo or Wilkinson. Can't speak for Hueston as it seems to be expanding really fast and I'm not sure what its status is. I have also heard that Selendy took a lot of the most toxic partners from Quinn and would really hesitate to advise someone to work there.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:36 pm
by Anonymous User
OP I know this is beyond the scope of your question but have you given thought to why you want to work for a lit boutique? The range of offerings and practice groups are typically narrower than you get at a comparably elite larger firm in NY.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:11 pm
by Anonymous User
Elsberg has "officially" gone off on his own: https://www.elsberglaw.com/

would be fascinated to know more about why and what kind of work he's taking with him

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:05 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:11 pm
Elsberg has "officially" gone off on his own: https://www.elsberglaw.com/

would be fascinated to know more about why and what kind of work he's taking with him
All the partners seem like they do corporate governance / securities litigation / Delaware Chancery type of work but not sure. The motivation would be super interesting to learn more about, although I'm sure the toxicity of Selendy didn't help.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:06 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:04 pm
Selendy is certainly not as selective as Molo or Wilkinson. Can't speak for Hueston as it seems to be expanding really fast and I'm not sure what its status is. I have also heard that Selendy took a lot of the most toxic partners from Quinn and would really hesitate to advise someone to work there.
Agreed on this. Molo/Wilkinson/Hueston are a tier above Selendy, both in terms of their selectivity, and matters handled.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:01 pm
by Anonymous User
All of the above has truth. Very high expectations and intense culture. SG is progressive and has elite commercial bet-the-company litigation matters (both plaintiff and defense) and leading pro bono cases. Recently, DE started a firm with partners from Quinn and several newly made SG partners. That firm will also be quite strong, as DE has a big book - bankruptcy, DE Chancery, high-stakes commercial cases, etc.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:09 am
by Anonymous User
These litigation boutiques sprout up like cockroaches. Here today, gone tomorrow.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 1:19 am
by Anonymous User
I have some talented friends who work there. When I considered Selendy, the range of litigation work was too narrow for my taste, but that was years ago and times may have changed.

Re: Thoughts on Selendy?

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:59 pm
by Anonymous User
Psycho gunners with no chill running pretty high-profile litigation.