Regulatory Practice and In-House Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
stroppier
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2022 6:56 pm
Regulatory Practice and In-House
Currently at a big law firm doing litigation, and I am not sure I love litigation, but I am even less interested in transactional. I have considered making a switch to a regulatory practice (still early enough in my career to make a switch), but I do not want to close off going in-house in the future. Is it difficult to go in-house from a regulatory practice? How does it compare to litigation (not general lit, so better odds in my case)? Obviously, transactional is usually king here, but I don't want to make the switch and then feel compelled to stay at the big firms forever.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Regulatory Practice and In-House
I’m currently in a regulatory practice, and we have many people go in house or to the relevant regulatory bodies. The regulatory needs are always there, and you can get really great specialization for a client’s needs. Depends on the specific type of regulatory practice—healthcare and investment management are pretty different.
