In-house inflection point: individual contributor or manager?
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2022 6:11 pm
Been practicing for over a decade. Spent first few years in BigLaw and the rest of the time in-house.
I've worked at two companies and have been an individual contributor the entire time. I enjoy doing my work, making sure my management has what they need, and turning my laptop off. At the old company, I really didn't like sitting in pointless meetings where I needed to say all the right political things and could also not see myself wanting to be General Counsel.
Current employer is awesome. I do work that I enjoy, have development opportunities in other legal/compliance groups, and respect my management. As an individual contributor, my focus is on answering questions from the business, making sure my work product is quality, and ensuring my management has what they need. My little slice of the pie keeps me engaged at work while also providing great WLB.
While I am several levels below GC, I can see myself wanting to pursue progression to GC here as the company's culture matches my own values to a T and the company's mission is one I truly believe in. All that said, I see how busy my immediate manager is. They're in meetings all day, need to be available in the early morning (and sometimes late at night) for Asia and Europe, and seem to be rushing from meeting to meeting. The company is one where managers actually have substantive work to do, so it's a bit of a double whammy where they need to be there for their team, make sure they are visible for cross-functional international projects, and make time to do their own work.
For those of you who moved into management roles with an eye to become GC, how did you make the decision to do so? What do you like about being a manager? What do you not like? Do you ever wish you had remained an individual contributor?
I've worked at two companies and have been an individual contributor the entire time. I enjoy doing my work, making sure my management has what they need, and turning my laptop off. At the old company, I really didn't like sitting in pointless meetings where I needed to say all the right political things and could also not see myself wanting to be General Counsel.
Current employer is awesome. I do work that I enjoy, have development opportunities in other legal/compliance groups, and respect my management. As an individual contributor, my focus is on answering questions from the business, making sure my work product is quality, and ensuring my management has what they need. My little slice of the pie keeps me engaged at work while also providing great WLB.
While I am several levels below GC, I can see myself wanting to pursue progression to GC here as the company's culture matches my own values to a T and the company's mission is one I truly believe in. All that said, I see how busy my immediate manager is. They're in meetings all day, need to be available in the early morning (and sometimes late at night) for Asia and Europe, and seem to be rushing from meeting to meeting. The company is one where managers actually have substantive work to do, so it's a bit of a double whammy where they need to be there for their team, make sure they are visible for cross-functional international projects, and make time to do their own work.
For those of you who moved into management roles with an eye to become GC, how did you make the decision to do so? What do you like about being a manager? What do you not like? Do you ever wish you had remained an individual contributor?