Can you make a lot as a Divorce/Family Attorney
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pm
Know too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=312092
How much is a lot? Eventually making low/mid six figures is realistic enough if you can build a practice, get lots of work, maybe take on a few associates/paralegals to maximize your throughput.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pmKnow too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
The exception to this is HNW divorces.The Lsat Airbender wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:48 amHow much is a lot? Eventually making low/mid six figures is realistic enough if you can build a practice, get lots of work, maybe take on a few associates/paralegals to maximize your throughput.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pmKnow too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
A problem with family law is that it's hard to scale beyond that size (whereas PI is a volume practice where one can aspire to adverts on billboards and double-digit firm size). So you're never going to break out from getting paid for work you're actually able to do in a workweek. Even if you're a rockstar who can bill above-market rates, those rates are still hourly; the math just isn't there to gross seven figures, let alone "make" that much as an individual.
Math seems easy enough, though? Let's say you have 4 associates you pay $150k each (call it $200k with healthcare, FICO, etc..) who bill 1500 hours a year at $400 an hour, and 75% is collected. And then also you, superstar founding partner, bill 1500 at $600 with same recovery. I'll even add 2 paralegals and a secretary as expenses ($150k total) and assume you don't collect any of their billables. That's $2.5 gross, $1.5 million after payroll. Is that an unreasonable model for a successful practice?The Lsat Airbender wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:48 amHow much is a lot? Eventually making low/mid six figures is realistic enough if you can build a practice, get lots of work, maybe take on a few associates/paralegals to maximize your throughput.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pmKnow too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
A problem with family law is that it's hard to scale beyond that size (whereas PI is a volume practice where one can aspire to adverts on billboards and double-digit firm size). So you're never going to break out from getting paid for work you're actually able to do in a workweek. Even if you're a rockstar who can bill above-market rates, those rates are still hourly; the math just isn't there to gross seven figures, let alone "make" that much as an individual.
That's conceivable, but good luck generating 7500 hours/year of business willing to pay what are basically biglaw rates. You'd have to really make a name for yourself in the HNW-divorce space as Sackboy suggests above—which is easier said than done and will make your income dependent on landing huge cases (i.e., rather irregular, which is a problem with all that fixed overhead).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:02 pmMath seems easy enough, though? Let's say you have 4 associates you pay $150k each (call it $200k with healthcare, FICO, etc..) who bill 1500 hours a year at $400 an hour, and 75% is collected. And then also you, superstar founding partner, bill 1500 at $600 with same recovery. I'll even add 2 paralegals and a secretary as expenses ($150k total) and assume you don't collect any of their billables. That's $2.5 gross, $1.5 million after payroll. Is that an unreasonable model for a successful practice?The Lsat Airbender wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:48 amHow much is a lot? Eventually making low/mid six figures is realistic enough if you can build a practice, get lots of work, maybe take on a few associates/paralegals to maximize your throughput.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pmKnow too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
A problem with family law is that it's hard to scale beyond that size (whereas PI is a volume practice where one can aspire to adverts on billboards and double-digit firm size). So you're never going to break out from getting paid for work you're actually able to do in a workweek. Even if you're a rockstar who can bill above-market rates, those rates are still hourly; the math just isn't there to gross seven figures, let alone "make" that much as an individual.
$400 an hour is biglaw rates? I'm a biglaw associate and my rate is like $900The Lsat Airbender wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:24 pmThat's conceivable, but good luck generating 7500 hours/year of business willing to pay what are basically biglaw rates. You'd have to really make a name for yourself in the HNW-divorce space as Sackboy suggests above—which is easier said than done and will make your income dependent on landing huge cases (i.e., rather irregular, which is a problem with all that fixed overhead).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:02 pmMath seems easy enough, though? Let's say you have 4 associates you pay $150k each (call it $200k with healthcare, FICO, etc..) who bill 1500 hours a year at $400 an hour, and 75% is collected. And then also you, superstar founding partner, bill 1500 at $600 with same recovery. I'll even add 2 paralegals and a secretary as expenses ($150k total) and assume you don't collect any of their billables. That's $2.5 gross, $1.5 million after payroll. Is that an unreasonable model for a successful practice?The Lsat Airbender wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:48 amHow much is a lot? Eventually making low/mid six figures is realistic enough if you can build a practice, get lots of work, maybe take on a few associates/paralegals to maximize your throughput.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:57 pmKnow too PI guys can make bank just wanted some figures on some top family attorneys.
A problem with family law is that it's hard to scale beyond that size (whereas PI is a volume practice where one can aspire to adverts on billboards and double-digit firm size). So you're never going to break out from getting paid for work you're actually able to do in a workweek. Even if you're a rockstar who can bill above-market rates, those rates are still hourly; the math just isn't there to gross seven figures, let alone "make" that much as an individual.
Yes, $400/hr. qualifies as pretty good midlaw/cost-sensitive biglaw rates for associates. You think shitlaw or small law is charging $400/hr for associates? That would put a small law/shitlaw firm at $680,000 in revenue for an associate who bills 1,700 hours (ignoring collections, because I'm lazy). Seyfarth Shaw is a pretty good midlaw/cost-sensitive biglaw firm has a revenue per lawyer of $807,000, which of course includes all of the equity/non-equity partners (like 65% of the firm) who charge the highest rates at the firm skewing that number upwards. Do you think shitlaw/small law or even the typical midlaw is achieving Seyfarth Shaw (#63 on AmLaw 200) rates? I feel like some common sense should get you to "No" pretty quickly.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:37 pm$400 an hour is biglaw rates? I'm a biglaw associate and my rate is like $900
It sounded great until the end.
I’m not a solo and know nothing about it, so props to you. But if I got 2700 hours of work at $150/hr, I think I would raise my rate. Have you considered that?
To be fair, if OP raised rates by 60%, OP might lose 80% of his or her work.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:47 pmI'm also curious about the 2700 hrs poster. If I were in this position, I'd just work 1800 for 250k? (math probably off bc of overhead but you get the idea). Are you just a workaholic?
Still, that's $130k for billing 540 hours a year. So long as it's not a HCOL area, where can I sign up?Sackboy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:21 pmTo be fair, if OP raised rates by 60%, OP might lose 80% of his or her work.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:47 pmI'm also curious about the 2700 hrs poster. If I were in this position, I'd just work 1800 for 250k? (math probably off bc of overhead but you get the idea). Are you just a workaholic?
I think you're responding to a different comment, I was just saying that 375k/2700 ≈ 250k/1800, at same rates and assuming overhead is proportional.Sackboy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:21 pmTo be fair, if OP raised rates by 60%, OP might lose 80% of his or her work.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:47 pmI'm also curious about the 2700 hrs poster. If I were in this position, I'd just work 1800 for 250k? (math probably off bc of overhead but you get the idea). Are you just a workaholic?
Bingo. I already went up from $120 to $150 at the end of 2020. I do very very little advertising. I get clients by the word of mouth and referrals from other lawyers/organizations. I get many clients because of my rates. I'm afraid increasing my rates would mean losing too much business.Sackboy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:21 pmTo be fair, if OP raised rates by 60%, OP might lose 80% of his or her work.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:47 pmI'm also curious about the 2700 hrs poster. If I were in this position, I'd just work 1800 for 250k? (math probably off bc of overhead but you get the idea). Are you just a workaholic?