Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Akin matched cravath
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
I know this was already obvious, but DC is cooked, so time for a compulsory dig at Arnold & PoorTTTer.
Also where Hogan Lovells at? Doubt they're stupid enough to go the AP route but who knows.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Crickets at Greenberg Traurig (non-East Coast office, anyways). Curious if the NY folks heard anything, at least.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Serious question: how does Milbank - now a legit comp leader - take this long to match (Cravath announced on Feb 28) if they are not thinking of/going to go over the top.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Greenberg Traurig stealthed numerous associates during the height of the pandemic, so I wouldn't be surprised if they cheap out and don't match.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:29 amAny news on Greenberg Traurig? A bunch of associate dinners by comp year were scheduled with managing shareholders in at least two offices that I know of, but only juniors have had that so far I think. Don't have high hopes given it's GT and all, but they did come out last year and make a big deal about matching the market scale in those offices where they weren't already...so would be hypocritical to now dodge market raises. But, that's Greenberg Traurig's thing (along with being cheap), really.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
And Wilmer with the re-raise. They're paying even less than Arnold & Poorhouse right nowAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 6:27 pmI know this was already obvious, but DC is cooked, so time for a compulsory dig at Arnold & PoorTTTer.
Also where Hogan Lovells at? Doubt they're stupid enough to go the AP route but who knows.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Shocking that CovingTTTon is the vanguard of DC right now. (Signed, proud CovingTTTon person.)Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:30 pmAnd Wilmer with the re-raise. They're paying even less than Arnold & Poorhouse right nowI know this was already obvious, but DC is cooked, so time for a compulsory dig at Arnold & PoorTTTer.
Also where Hogan Lovells at? Doubt they're stupid enough to go the AP route but who knows.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
bumping this as the only sensible post in this entire godforsaken threadUltramar vistas wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:22 pmIt’s wild to me that not a single article about “jaw dropping” associate raises and “salary wars” ever bothers to (a) do the inflation math, or even mention it, or (b) properly contextualize associate salaries in the broader environment of firm profitability.
There’s no doubt that associates in 2022 are doing pretty well, but inflation makes the current numbers look much less eye popping (first years in 2008 were better off, midlevels now are ahead) and is going to continue to quickly erode those momentary gains unless salary increases continue like this (which is never guaranteed).
Also, law firms generally are doing extremely well - when every new day brings another article with an AmLaw firm showing PEP up 10 to 50%, it should be expected that the worker bees see some benefit - isn’t that their Reaganomics in action?
I just can’t stand the tone of these articles.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
As a former GT senior associate in NY during the pandemic, not sure where you’re getting this from, certainly never heard it myself (and I have no reason to protect the firm). Firms that stealthed during the pandemic got outted here, ATL, wherever…nothing about GT doing it. They didn’t even cut salaries, no austerity measures. You seem like someone who just has a grudge unless you care to actually provide any evidence to back this up.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:33 pmGreenberg Traurig stealthed numerous associates during the height of the pandemic, so I wouldn't be surprised if they cheap out and don't match.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:29 amAny news on Greenberg Traurig? A bunch of associate dinners by comp year were scheduled with managing shareholders in at least two offices that I know of, but only juniors have had that so far I think. Don't have high hopes given it's GT and all, but they did come out last year and make a big deal about matching the market scale in those offices where they weren't already...so would be hypocritical to now dodge market raises. But, that's Greenberg Traurig's thing (along with being cheap), really.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Partner made a comment he thought it was ridiculous 8th years are making more money than he did as a junior partner 15 years ago.
Does he even know what the firms bills an 8th year out in 2022 vs 2007?
Does he even know what the firms bills an 8th year out in 2022 vs 2007?
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
A possible recession is precisely why it's important to lock in base raises.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 1:04 pmIt's pretty funny that biglaw associates are the only professional class that don't see a recession coming very soon.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
A dollar in 2007 = 1.3 in 2021, and by the time we're done this year likely 1.4-1.5. If he was making 350 as a junior partner that's about 500k today.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:45 amPartner made a comment he thought it was ridiculous 8th years are making more money than he did as a junior partner 15 years ago.
Does he even know what the firms bills an 8th year out in 2022 vs 2007?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Hogan just matched Cravath retro to Jan. 1 and paid in March.
Notably, Hogan explicitly exempted Miami from the new scale, so not great news for GT associates in the Sunshine State. The extraordinary cheapness of firms in that market never ceases to amaze.
Notably, Hogan explicitly exempted Miami from the new scale, so not great news for GT associates in the Sunshine State. The extraordinary cheapness of firms in that market never ceases to amaze.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Greenberg Traurig matched market finally in Miami last year...now it seems doubtful they'll match market again (and even if they did, they would never do a true true-up retro to January 1st, it's not their style of being incredibly cheap). So who will actually pay true market in Miami this year? White & Case, and....McDermott (do they pay market in every US office)? Sucks - aside from taxes it is not a cheap place to live compared to NYC unless you want to live in the Everglades and commute 2 hours to work.
-
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Lol at someone in Miami trying to say that it’s not that much cheaper to live in Miami than NY. Brickell is cheaper than many parts of Queens.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:38 amGreenberg Traurig matched market finally in Miami last year...now it seems doubtful they'll match market again (and even if they did, they would never do a true true-up retro to January 1st, it's not their style of being incredibly cheap). So who will actually pay true market in Miami this year? White & Case, and....McDermott (do they pay market in every US office)? Sucks - aside from taxes it is not a cheap place to live compared to NYC unless you want to live in the Everglades and commute 2 hours to work.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
I heard it firsthand from someone it happened to so I believe it. I don't have a grudge. I've never worked there and I have no stake in whether they match. They just have a TTT reputation for how they treat associates.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 11:24 pmAs a former GT senior associate in NY during the pandemic, not sure where you’re getting this from, certainly never heard it myself (and I have no reason to protect the firm). Firms that stealthed during the pandemic got outted here, ATL, wherever…nothing about GT doing it. They didn’t even cut salaries, no austerity measures. You seem like someone who just has a grudge unless you care to actually provide any evidence to back this up.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:33 pmGreenberg Traurig stealthed numerous associates during the height of the pandemic, so I wouldn't be surprised if they cheap out and don't match.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:29 amAny news on Greenberg Traurig? A bunch of associate dinners by comp year were scheduled with managing shareholders in at least two offices that I know of, but only juniors have had that so far I think. Don't have high hopes given it's GT and all, but they did come out last year and make a big deal about matching the market scale in those offices where they weren't already...so would be hypocritical to now dodge market raises. But, that's Greenberg Traurig's thing (along with being cheap), really.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
And Arnold & Poorhouse takes another LAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:15 amHogan just matched Cravath retro to Jan. 1 and paid in March.
Notably, Hogan explicitly exempted Miami from the new scale, so not great news for GT associates in the Sunshine State. The extraordinary cheapness of firms in that market never ceases to amaze.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:34 pm
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
+ "aside from taxes" is like a 10-15% difference. That's more than someone pays in rent for the year.2013 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:47 amLol at someone in Miami trying to say that it’s not that much cheaper to live in Miami than NY. Brickell is cheaper than many parts of Queens.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:38 amGreenberg Traurig matched market finally in Miami last year...now it seems doubtful they'll match market again (and even if they did, they would never do a true true-up retro to January 1st, it's not their style of being incredibly cheap). So who will actually pay true market in Miami this year? White & Case, and....McDermott (do they pay market in every US office)? Sucks - aside from taxes it is not a cheap place to live compared to NYC unless you want to live in the Everglades and commute 2 hours to work.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Will the Desmarais spring bonuses mean anything for biglaw or are they kind of unique?
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
I doubt it. They're a unique case. They used to pay 20k above NY market for base, and now pay market(?) They're a lit boutique and won't affect what the NY corporate market does.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:27 pmWill the Desmarais spring bonuses mean anything for biglaw or are they kind of unique?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
No. Desmarais is routinely over market for bonuses and comp. I don't think biglaw firms see them as a peer for compensation.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:27 pmWill the Desmarais spring bonuses mean anything for biglaw or are they kind of unique?
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
To the Brickell vs. Queens people in this NYC vs. Miami CoL "debate" -
Correct on the taxes (and I include RE taxes in this if you're a homeowner), but LOL at some fool making a statement that Brickell is cheaper than "many parts of Queens" as if that proves anything - most of Queens is a shit hole outside of a few nice areas, and so is Brickell so your comparison is moronic or ignorant unless you're comparing the best of one to the worst of the other. As a Brooklyn native who's spent approximately half their adult lives living in Miami vs. NYC, is over 40, and owns properties in both NYC and Miami, I speak from a lot of experience. Non-rent/home-ownership costs (groceries, eating out, entertainment, etc.) of someone living a typical upper-middle or upper class lifestyle (all of this should be in the context of the average privileged biglaw associate) have now risen to NYC prices, and both rent and home ownership costs are catching up. If you're relying on some calculator like on CNN Money to compute the CoL difference you clearly have little grasp of economic and finance as well, since those generalized CoL comparisons are based on a number of erroneous underlying assumptions and there's a lot of variables involved here, obviously. Again, I'm talking about someone living the same quality of life in each location with similar expenditures. Sure, you could move out to the outskirts of Brickell on the southern side and (incorrectly) compare that to Astoria/Ridewood/etc....again that's only rent/owning a home which is one piece of the puzzle...but that's a flawed analysis obviously, and I could do it in reverse for a better area of Brickell (or Miami, if you think Brickell is the nicest and most expensive area of Miami you know less than I thought). So going back to your original comparison of Brickell vs. "many parts of Queens" being cheaper is absurd unless you are comparing the absolute shit holes of Brickell to the nicest part of Queens. Again, any decent CoL comparison needs to keep the underlying QoL variables consistent.
Correct on the taxes (and I include RE taxes in this if you're a homeowner), but LOL at some fool making a statement that Brickell is cheaper than "many parts of Queens" as if that proves anything - most of Queens is a shit hole outside of a few nice areas, and so is Brickell so your comparison is moronic or ignorant unless you're comparing the best of one to the worst of the other. As a Brooklyn native who's spent approximately half their adult lives living in Miami vs. NYC, is over 40, and owns properties in both NYC and Miami, I speak from a lot of experience. Non-rent/home-ownership costs (groceries, eating out, entertainment, etc.) of someone living a typical upper-middle or upper class lifestyle (all of this should be in the context of the average privileged biglaw associate) have now risen to NYC prices, and both rent and home ownership costs are catching up. If you're relying on some calculator like on CNN Money to compute the CoL difference you clearly have little grasp of economic and finance as well, since those generalized CoL comparisons are based on a number of erroneous underlying assumptions and there's a lot of variables involved here, obviously. Again, I'm talking about someone living the same quality of life in each location with similar expenditures. Sure, you could move out to the outskirts of Brickell on the southern side and (incorrectly) compare that to Astoria/Ridewood/etc....again that's only rent/owning a home which is one piece of the puzzle...but that's a flawed analysis obviously, and I could do it in reverse for a better area of Brickell (or Miami, if you think Brickell is the nicest and most expensive area of Miami you know less than I thought). So going back to your original comparison of Brickell vs. "many parts of Queens" being cheaper is absurd unless you are comparing the absolute shit holes of Brickell to the nicest part of Queens. Again, any decent CoL comparison needs to keep the underlying QoL variables consistent.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
This guy has been waiting forever for this momentAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:50 pmTo the Brickell vs. Queens people in this NYC vs. Miami CoL "debate" -
Correct on the taxes (and I include RE taxes in this if you're a homeowner), but LOL at some fool making a statement that Brickell is cheaper than "many parts of Queens" as if that proves anything - most of Queens is a shit hole outside of a few nice areas, and so is Brickell so your comparison is moronic or ignorant unless you're comparing the best of one to the worst of the other. As a Brooklyn native who's spent approximately half their adult lives living in Miami vs. NYC, is over 40, and owns properties in both NYC and Miami, I speak from a lot of experience. Non-rent/home-ownership costs (groceries, eating out, entertainment, etc.) of someone living a typical upper-middle or upper class lifestyle (all of this should be in the context of the average privileged biglaw associate) have now risen to NYC prices, and both rent and home ownership costs are catching up. If you're relying on some calculator like on CNN Money to compute the CoL difference you clearly have little grasp of economic and finance as well, since those generalized CoL comparisons are based on a number of erroneous underlying assumptions and there's a lot of variables involved here, obviously. Again, I'm talking about someone living the same quality of life in each location with similar expenditures. Sure, you could move out to the outskirts of Brickell on the southern side and (incorrectly) compare that to Astoria/Ridewood/etc....again that's only rent/owning a home which is one piece of the puzzle...but that's a flawed analysis obviously, and I could do it in reverse for a better area of Brickell (or Miami, if you think Brickell is the nicest and most expensive area of Miami you know less than I thought). So going back to your original comparison of Brickell vs. "many parts of Queens" being cheaper is absurd unless you are comparing the absolute shit holes of Brickell to the nicest part of Queens. Again, any decent CoL comparison needs to keep the underlying QoL variables consistent.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k
Ditto for NYC versus Dallas/Austin COL comparisons from someone whose lived in each for 10+ yearsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:50 pmTo the Brickell vs. Queens people in this NYC vs. Miami CoL "debate" -
If you're relying on some calculator like on CNN Money to compute the CoL difference you clearly have little grasp of economic and finance as well, since those generalized CoL comparisons are based on a number of erroneous underlying assumptions and there's a lot of variables involved here, obviously.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login