Milbank/Davis Polk/Cravath Scale: NYC to 215-415k Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:14 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:41 pm
Since we're still waiting on DPW, I'll ask something I'm curious about. Why does Milbank keep making this play? Is it literally about the Vault rankings? Why isn't another profitable-but-not-v10 firm making the same move?
Yes vault rankings and general perception as "elite".

The others are not because Biglaw is an oligopoly. There's no incentive for the existing V10 firms to repeatedly make these moves since they're already at the top of the pack. They'll just fall in line with the market when a traditional market setter or a worthy enough maverick like Milbank decides to name a different price. The moves have done wonders for Milbank, which is now a household name in Biglaw circles.
Is it? Is Milbank getting better business, and better lawyers? Or is this just something that "very-online", and mostly junior, associates perceive?
"Very online" and "mostly junior" associates are your next generation of partners. Reputations take time to build (though can quickly be destroyed) and Milbank has done a lot in the past five years to advance its reputation.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:18 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:14 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:41 pm
Since we're still waiting on DPW, I'll ask something I'm curious about. Why does Milbank keep making this play? Is it literally about the Vault rankings? Why isn't another profitable-but-not-v10 firm making the same move?
Yes vault rankings and general perception as "elite".

The others are not because Biglaw is an oligopoly. There's no incentive for the existing V10 firms to repeatedly make these moves since they're already at the top of the pack. They'll just fall in line with the market when a traditional market setter or a worthy enough maverick like Milbank decides to name a different price. The moves have done wonders for Milbank, which is now a household name in Biglaw circles.
Is it? Is Milbank getting better business, and better lawyers? Or is this just something that "very-online", and mostly junior, associates perceive?
"Very online" and "mostly junior" associates are your next generation of partners. Reputations take time to build (though can quickly be destroyed) and Milbank has done a lot in the past five years to advance its reputation.
If not partner then in house counsel that may give Milbank business. They are building up good will among law students and associates at other firms, all of whom are grateful for the raises. If they keep it up for another 15 years or so, they would likely unseat Cravath as #1 most elite name in the legal profession. It takes about a generation to solidify a reputation.

If they have money to throw around, why not invest in their future? If they don’t do it first, someone else would do it and they’d have to follow and do the same anyways but lose out on the trend-setter status.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:24 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:14 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:41 pm
Since we're still waiting on DPW, I'll ask something I'm curious about. Why does Milbank keep making this play? Is it literally about the Vault rankings? Why isn't another profitable-but-not-v10 firm making the same move?
Yes vault rankings and general perception as "elite".

The others are not because Biglaw is an oligopoly. There's no incentive for the existing V10 firms to repeatedly make these moves since they're already at the top of the pack. They'll just fall in line with the market when a traditional market setter or a worthy enough maverick like Milbank decides to name a different price. The moves have done wonders for Milbank, which is now a household name in Biglaw circles.
Is it? Is Milbank getting better business, and better lawyers? Or is this just something that "very-online", and mostly junior, associates perceive?
"Very online" and "mostly junior" associates are your next generation of partners. Reputations take time to build (though can quickly be destroyed) and Milbank has done a lot in the past five years to advance its reputation.
I think the "very online" junior associates are the miserable people around here who groupthink their way into hating their jobs and lives and are out of BigLaw in 3-4 years.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:29 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:24 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:14 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:41 pm
Since we're still waiting on DPW, I'll ask something I'm curious about. Why does Milbank keep making this play? Is it literally about the Vault rankings? Why isn't another profitable-but-not-v10 firm making the same move?
Yes vault rankings and general perception as "elite".

The others are not because Biglaw is an oligopoly. There's no incentive for the existing V10 firms to repeatedly make these moves since they're already at the top of the pack. They'll just fall in line with the market when a traditional market setter or a worthy enough maverick like Milbank decides to name a different price. The moves have done wonders for Milbank, which is now a household name in Biglaw circles.
Is it? Is Milbank getting better business, and better lawyers? Or is this just something that "very-online", and mostly junior, associates perceive?
"Very online" and "mostly junior" associates are your next generation of partners. Reputations take time to build (though can quickly be destroyed) and Milbank has done a lot in the past five years to advance its reputation.
I think the "very online" junior associates are the miserable people around here who groupthink their way into hating their jobs and lives and are out of BigLaw in 3-4 years.
Too cynical IMO. And speaking as someone with more than a decade in biglaw, most people are out of biglaw in 3-4 years, so you could render your point as "they're average" anyway. People at my firm (V10) are definitely aware that Milbank and DPW are pushing compensation and that Milbank especially is rising through the ranks reputationally; it's not just a TLS thing.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:54 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:29 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:24 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:14 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:41 pm
Since we're still waiting on DPW, I'll ask something I'm curious about. Why does Milbank keep making this play? Is it literally about the Vault rankings? Why isn't another profitable-but-not-v10 firm making the same move?
Yes vault rankings and general perception as "elite".

The others are not because Biglaw is an oligopoly. There's no incentive for the existing V10 firms to repeatedly make these moves since they're already at the top of the pack. They'll just fall in line with the market when a traditional market setter or a worthy enough maverick like Milbank decides to name a different price. The moves have done wonders for Milbank, which is now a household name in Biglaw circles.
Is it? Is Milbank getting better business, and better lawyers? Or is this just something that "very-online", and mostly junior, associates perceive?
"Very online" and "mostly junior" associates are your next generation of partners. Reputations take time to build (though can quickly be destroyed) and Milbank has done a lot in the past five years to advance its reputation.
I think the "very online" junior associates are the miserable people around here who groupthink their way into hating their jobs and lives and are out of BigLaw in 3-4 years.
Too cynical IMO. And speaking as someone with more than a decade in biglaw, most people are out of biglaw in 3-4 years, so you could render your point as "they're average" anyway. People at my firm (V10) are definitely aware that Milbank and DPW are pushing compensation and that Milbank especially is rising through the ranks reputationally; it's not just a TLS thing.
Obviously everyone has different experiences, but I have been very involved in hiring at my V10 for a number of years now, and over all that time, I think we've lost an offered student to Milbank maybe twice (MAYBE; might have only been once). We've lost tons to the usual V10 suspects, of course. Just not Milbank. The firm is just not considered a peer where I am.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 3:33 am

I hope the V5 doesn't match so as to help the fight against inflation - just my perspective. Making less $ is cooler anyway

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:55 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 3:33 am
I hope the V5 doesn't match so as to help the fight against inflation - just my perspective. Making less $ is cooler anyway
Fwiw there is something noble in not just doing the work for the money.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:33 am

An hour or so until the announcement-what are people thinking? Raise or special bonuses?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:50 am

The Partnership Pravda Law.com reports this morning: “More Money Could Mean More Problems for Associates.” We should all beware that “the gravy train may end up derailing for some associates.” (Nothing about how partners will continue to, ahem, run train on associates, though.)

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:09 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:33 am
An hour or so until the announcement-what are people thinking? Raise or special bonuses?
An hour or 3 days. Either one possible

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:46 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:09 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:33 am
An hour or so until the announcement-what are people thinking? Raise or special bonuses?
An hour or 3 days. Either one possible

Could be 3 weeks

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:52 am

Just received my compensation award letter for the 2022-2023 year (fiscal year is Feb 1-January 31) and Foley & Lardner remains on the old (shitty) salary scale; of which class of 2018 and later is $25k below market in all markets.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:52 am
Just received my compensation award letter for the 2022-2023 year (fiscal year is Feb 1-January 31) and Foley & Lardner remains on the old (shitty) salary scale; of which class of 2018 and later is $25k below market in all markets.
Do you think Foley is going to match? Or ever move to lockstep through all class years?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:35 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:09 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:52 am
Just received my compensation award letter for the 2022-2023 year (fiscal year is Feb 1-January 31) and Foley & Lardner remains on the old (shitty) salary scale; of which class of 2018 and later is $25k below market in all markets.
Do you think Foley is going to match? Or ever move to lockstep through all class years?
Do their markets support the kind of rates that would make this possible?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:38 pm

accidental double post
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:35 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:09 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:52 am
Just received my compensation award letter for the 2022-2023 year (fiscal year is Feb 1-January 31) and Foley & Lardner remains on the old (shitty) salary scale; of which class of 2018 and later is $25k below market in all markets.
Do you think Foley is going to match? Or ever move to lockstep through all class years?
Do their markets support the kind of rates that would make this possible?
They matched DPW and moved all markets to the same scale last round (including in states like Wisconsin and Florida). They’re also an AmLaw 50 firm that keeps saying that last year was their best year yet. So I’d think so? But admittedly I don’t know much about this (that’s why I’m asking).

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:41 pm

It's been 8 days DPW. You've had a full business week plus a day. Let's get this going. Scale match + spring bonuses.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:51 pm

Has this been the slowest match rate of all time? I feel like every prior one we'd see firms matching every day but this has gotten zero traffic except for a handful of firms.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:03 pm

IMO, Davis Polk is deliberately slow rolling as a way of flexing on us all.

The dominance move is, “you little babies can’t do anything until we tell you to” and prolonging this limbo just highlights their alpha control over the situation vs. Cravath et al.’s weakness.

Am I just anonymously baiting Cravath into proving me wrong on a random forum? Maybe.

User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by glitched » Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:09 pm

I wonder if the recent surges in associate salary and bonuses are tied to some type of tax consequences. I know the SALT cap had a big impact on the bottom line. Because of pass through tax, a 100k increase in salaries actually costs 40 or so k to the firm. That's a pretty good deal to keep associates on the roster.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:03 pm
IMO, Davis Polk is deliberately slow rolling as a way of flexing on us all.

The dominance move is, “you little babies can’t do anything until we tell you to” and prolonging this limbo just highlights their alpha control over the situation vs. Cravath et al.’s weakness.

Am I just anonymously baiting Cravath into proving me wrong on a random forum? Maybe.
Pretty sure Cravath has accepted that its days as market leader are over, at least for the foreseeable future. Not sure why that happened, since they still have that old-school preftige to hold onto and end up matching DPW/Milbank like every other firm anyway so it doesn't cost them anything to be first mover. But after getting dunked on after trying to establish market bonuses last year, I wouldn't be eager to do anything before DPW if I were Cravath.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:11 pm

.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:10 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:03 pm
IMO, Davis Polk is deliberately slow rolling as a way of flexing on us all.

The dominance move is, “you little babies can’t do anything until we tell you to” and prolonging this limbo just highlights their alpha control over the situation vs. Cravath et al.’s weakness.

Am I just anonymously baiting Cravath into proving me wrong on a random forum? Maybe.
Pretty sure Cravath has accepted that its days as market leader are over, at least for the foreseeable future. Not sure why that happened, since they still have that old-school preftige to hold onto and end up matching DPW/Milbank like every other firm anyway so it doesn't cost them anything to be first mover. But after getting dunked on after trying to establish market bonuses last year, I wouldn't be eager to do anything before DPW if I were Cravath.
Well Cravath is almost out of the Top 10 in terms of RPL, and Milbank is right on their heels at #12. (https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2021 ... er-lawyer/)

Also, I don't think they had a year on part with DPW/Milbank/K&E etc.

lawshark1

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:35 pm

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by lawshark1 » Fri Jan 28, 2022 2:24 pm

Irell & Luner went to 225k starting

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Milbank Scale: NYC to 215K - 385K

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 28, 2022 2:25 pm

lawshark1 wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 2:24 pm
Irell & Luner went to 225k starting
Weren't they always above market? Or does this mean something?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”