How do you choose between diametrically opposed practice areas?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 11:41 pm
Hi everyone.
I am a 1L at a T14. I realize that this is probably premature but I'm thinking about practice groups already. Because I am an older student (32) and already established in my own career, I am trying--and always have tried--to take a practical approach to law school. Ideally, I would like to pick a practice area that is complementary to what my background is in, which is the dual citizenship space. My best case scenario end goal is to open up my own firm specializing in tax advising and global citizenship and residency planning for high net worth and ultra high net worth individuals. I've always had an entrepreneurial bent and know how to open and run a business. To get there, I would most likely want to put in 4-5 years of practice in a tax group first to build a book of business and really understand what I am doing.
However, I am also realistic. I know that businesses/firms can fail and specializing in tax neither means I will love it nor that I will end up being successful if I hang my own shingly. I wonder if it might be more prudent to concentrate on an area with better exit options such as capital markets. As a bonus, capital markets is the one practice area which is popular for US-trained attorneys in a particular European country where my husband is from. I would love to live there earning a US salary working for the US office of a firm in his country.
Herein lies the dilemma:
Do I explore tax, which I find highly interesting and which would possibly lend me an opportunity to open up my own firm/grow my current business (which my husband runs while I am in school)? It is a very lucrative field but there is no guarantee of success. It would also "tie" me down to living in the US for at least the next 7-8 years.
Or do I explore capital markets, an area I'm not particularly passionate about but which has good exit options and which could (possibly) land me a job in a country I want to live in very much?
Any thoughts are appreciated!
I am a 1L at a T14. I realize that this is probably premature but I'm thinking about practice groups already. Because I am an older student (32) and already established in my own career, I am trying--and always have tried--to take a practical approach to law school. Ideally, I would like to pick a practice area that is complementary to what my background is in, which is the dual citizenship space. My best case scenario end goal is to open up my own firm specializing in tax advising and global citizenship and residency planning for high net worth and ultra high net worth individuals. I've always had an entrepreneurial bent and know how to open and run a business. To get there, I would most likely want to put in 4-5 years of practice in a tax group first to build a book of business and really understand what I am doing.
However, I am also realistic. I know that businesses/firms can fail and specializing in tax neither means I will love it nor that I will end up being successful if I hang my own shingly. I wonder if it might be more prudent to concentrate on an area with better exit options such as capital markets. As a bonus, capital markets is the one practice area which is popular for US-trained attorneys in a particular European country where my husband is from. I would love to live there earning a US salary working for the US office of a firm in his country.
Herein lies the dilemma:
Do I explore tax, which I find highly interesting and which would possibly lend me an opportunity to open up my own firm/grow my current business (which my husband runs while I am in school)? It is a very lucrative field but there is no guarantee of success. It would also "tie" me down to living in the US for at least the next 7-8 years.
Or do I explore capital markets, an area I'm not particularly passionate about but which has good exit options and which could (possibly) land me a job in a country I want to live in very much?
Any thoughts are appreciated!