Can you link to this article/post?attorney589753 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:46 pmIf you prefer lit, do lit. If indifferent, do corporate. David Lat wrote about this recently and I thought his take was solid (basically better exit options/optionality/career prospects in corp.)Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:46 pmWould you recommend lit to someone who's genuinely indifferent between lit and corp?
Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:13 pm
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 2:26 pm
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
The above is definitely fair. But, beyond just being "excited" about something which is sort of nebulous, my advice would be to get granular on the positions you're looking at.objctnyrhnr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:43 pmDon’t mean to be rude but the notion of being indifferent to these massively different types of practice is pretty mind blowing to me.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:46 pmWould you recommend lit to someone who's genuinely indifferent between lit and corp?
With that said, if you aren’t excited about lit you probably won’t excel at lit. By contrast, nobody is really that excited about transactional practices so your lack of enthusiasm probably won’t stand out.
I would assume that OP in this comment is probably incoming to big law, so still a student. If that's the case OP, I would say specify "corp" a bit for yourself. You might like PE work more than Capital Markets or M&A more than funds or regulatory work.
Additionally, do you just mean transactional or do you specifically mean gen. corporate? If you're open to transactional and like the combination of corporate and litigation restructuring is always possible. It's a pretty good mix of both worlds and a lot of the shops are in team-building/hiring business phases.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
OP who asked the question here. Thank you both! I am an incoming associate. I felt genuinely indifferent because the total amount of exposure I had was a shortened virtual program.nls336 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:08 amThe above is definitely fair. But, beyond just being "excited" about something which is sort of nebulous, my advice would be to get granular on the positions you're looking at.objctnyrhnr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:43 pmDon’t mean to be rude but the notion of being indifferent to these massively different types of practice is pretty mind blowing to me.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:46 pmWould you recommend lit to someone who's genuinely indifferent between lit and corp?
With that said, if you aren’t excited about lit you probably won’t excel at lit. By contrast, nobody is really that excited about transactional practices so your lack of enthusiasm probably won’t stand out.
I would assume that OP in this comment is probably incoming to big law, so still a student. If that's the case OP, I would say specify "corp" a bit for yourself. You might like PE work more than Capital Markets or M&A more than funds or regulatory work.
Additionally, do you just mean transactional or do you specifically mean gen. corporate? If you're open to transactional and like the combination of corporate and litigation restructuring is always possible. It's a pretty good mix of both worlds and a lot of the shops are in team-building/hiring business phases.
I know I don't like transactional (cap markets in particular), but I'm concerned about the prospect of lit in general because everyone seems to suggest that lit doesn't and won't generate enough revenue.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:42 pm
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
I mean that is just an exceptional level of laziness, but OK: https://abovethelaw.com/2020/02/mammas- ... itigators/jacky9 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:28 pmCan you link to this article/post?attorney589753 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:46 pmIf you prefer lit, do lit. If indifferent, do corporate. David Lat wrote about this recently and I thought his take was solid (basically better exit options/optionality/career prospects in corp.)Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:46 pmWould you recommend lit to someone who's genuinely indifferent between lit and corp?
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
[/quote]
I think you get out of it what you put in. If you coast by, looking for easy assignments that let you bill a lot of hours without really challenging you or putting you in a position of taking risk, then you're going to be leaving by your third or fourth year. By that time, there won't be enough of those assignments to keep you busy, and you'll be sick to death of them anyway. I definitely feel some tiredness/burnout, but esp at this stage the work really is intellectually stimulating, I have a little more control over my workload and schedule, and the pay is pretty amazing. I was working from home over 50% of the time pre-COVID, now it's been essentially 100%. How many people would love to do interesting work from their home for almost $30k/month? I feel like I could be one of those spam/BS ads saying you can make XYZ dollars a month from home on the internet.
My biggest gripe is that it's so hard to develop my own clients, and I've found I really do like interacting directly with clients. And by interacting directly with clients, I mean doing more than hounding after them for documents and information in response to discovery requests. That's another aspect of biglaw lit I think. My understanding is that corp/trans people interact a lot more with the firm's clients. And this is all another reason I keep pondering the idea of opening my own practice at about half the billing rate.
[/quote]
What's the take-home pay on that $30k?
I think you get out of it what you put in. If you coast by, looking for easy assignments that let you bill a lot of hours without really challenging you or putting you in a position of taking risk, then you're going to be leaving by your third or fourth year. By that time, there won't be enough of those assignments to keep you busy, and you'll be sick to death of them anyway. I definitely feel some tiredness/burnout, but esp at this stage the work really is intellectually stimulating, I have a little more control over my workload and schedule, and the pay is pretty amazing. I was working from home over 50% of the time pre-COVID, now it's been essentially 100%. How many people would love to do interesting work from their home for almost $30k/month? I feel like I could be one of those spam/BS ads saying you can make XYZ dollars a month from home on the internet.
My biggest gripe is that it's so hard to develop my own clients, and I've found I really do like interacting directly with clients. And by interacting directly with clients, I mean doing more than hounding after them for documents and information in response to discovery requests. That's another aspect of biglaw lit I think. My understanding is that corp/trans people interact a lot more with the firm's clients. And this is all another reason I keep pondering the idea of opening my own practice at about half the billing rate.
[/quote]
What's the take-home pay on that $30k?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
What do you think of the conventional wisdom (at least on here) that smaller is better, boutiques > biglaw, etc. for litigators? Would you do biglaw again if you had the option to go somewhere where you could build your own practice more easily, or is the corp-subsidized money and lack of salary compression worth it to you?
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
I agree with the conventional wisdom on here. I would probably join a strong boutique litigation practice if I could redo everything. Fortunately, biglaw has basically worked out for me, but I definitely didn't really understand or appreciate the career decision I was making by going that route as compared to going the more more "high end" boutique practice route.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 9:27 pmWhat do you think of the conventional wisdom (at least on here) that smaller is better, boutiques > biglaw, etc. for litigators? Would you do biglaw again if you had the option to go somewhere where you could build your own practice more easily, or is the corp-subsidized money and lack of salary compression worth it to you?
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
I think you get out of it what you put in. If you coast by, looking for easy assignments that let you bill a lot of hours without really challenging you or putting you in a position of taking risk, then you're going to be leaving by your third or fourth year. By that time, there won't be enough of those assignments to keep you busy, and you'll be sick to death of them anyway. I definitely feel some tiredness/burnout, but esp at this stage the work really is intellectually stimulating, I have a little more control over my workload and schedule, and the pay is pretty amazing. I was working from home over 50% of the time pre-COVID, now it's been essentially 100%. How many people would love to do interesting work from their home for almost $30k/month? I feel like I could be one of those spam/BS ads saying you can make XYZ dollars a month from home on the internet.
My biggest gripe is that it's so hard to develop my own clients, and I've found I really do like interacting directly with clients. And by interacting directly with clients, I mean doing more than hounding after them for documents and information in response to discovery requests. That's another aspect of biglaw lit I think. My understanding is that corp/trans people interact a lot more with the firm's clients. And this is all another reason I keep pondering the idea of opening my own practice at about half the billing rate.
[/quote]
What's the take-home pay on that $30k?
[/quote]
Once 401k is maxed out and OASDI caps out, about $20k.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
Kiddos, you can absolutely do this for years if you want. There are seniors, counsels and even partners who make a career off a high volume of super-easy shit, or even low volumes of things that are specialized but ultimately pretty easy.
The job does not *have* to only be about money, but it's totally fine if that's all it is.
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
Fair enough, I agree. The context of my comment was someone asking what keeps me around and if the job ever gets fulfilling "beyond just the paycheck." My answer is that it can become fulfilling beyond just the paycheck.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: ↑Wed Sep 15, 2021 7:36 pmKiddos, you can absolutely do this for years if you want. There are seniors, counsels and even partners who make a career off a high volume of super-easy shit, or even low volumes of things that are specialized but ultimately pretty easy.
The job does not *have* to only be about money, but it's totally fine if that's all it is.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
I'm at one of the "tip top" litigation practices (V10) and this isn't the case at all for us. There's still very much a hierarchy of work. A senior associate would not be caught dead doing doc review; junior attorneys aren't writing substantive briefs, etc. Maybe our practice is more resilient to change than most because we're at the top of the market but I haven't seen our operations change significantly over the past x years even as we continue to make more and more money (as a firm -- I sense litigation is basically flat to low growth which is fine from the firm's perspective given worse outcomes at other firms).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 11:29 amI'm in the same class year/practice group. This is spot onandrostan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:59 am
As far as how BL has changed, I can comment a bit on litigation at least. I can't say anything valuable about non-litigation practice. Basically, the structure of litigation groups has almost completely flattened. Attorneys from 1st year through >8 are involved in doc review, depo prep, brief writing, etc. Everyone's input is welcomed and valued. I've seen even older partners move in this direction since I started. It feels good to be valued and the environment/culture has improved. The downside is that the pressure on younger attorneys feel is higher, but that is probably an inevitable tradeoff when choosing to start your career at a big firm and simultaneously wanting substantive, high-level experience. The days of having junior associates bill ungodly hours for routine doc review are just gone, which should be no surprise since they were already waning when I started. The days of having junior associates do a bunch of research of questionable value are mostly gone too. My impression is that corp/trans practices have experienced this shift a bit, but not nearly to the extent as litigation practices. It's also probably less relevant at the tip top litigation practices in the country.
HTH.
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
Thanks for this perspective. My understanding is that, in general, the extent to which a particular firm has changed since the recession is correlated to where it's situated in the market. The very tip-top firms are mostly operating as they were before. Probably if I hadn't switched from my summer firm and "compromised" a bit through 3L OCI, I would be singing a different tune.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Sep 17, 2021 11:26 amI'm at one of the "tip top" litigation practices (V10) and this isn't the case at all for us. There's still very much a hierarchy of work. A senior associate would not be caught dead doing doc review; junior attorneys aren't writing substantive briefs, etc. Maybe our practice is more resilient to change than most because we're at the top of the market but I haven't seen our operations change significantly over the past x years even as we continue to make more and more money (as a firm -- I sense litigation is basically flat to low growth which is fine from the firm's perspective given worse outcomes at other firms).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 11:29 amI'm in the same class year/practice group. This is spot onandrostan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:59 am
As far as how BL has changed, I can comment a bit on litigation at least. I can't say anything valuable about non-litigation practice. Basically, the structure of litigation groups has almost completely flattened. Attorneys from 1st year through >8 are involved in doc review, depo prep, brief writing, etc. Everyone's input is welcomed and valued. I've seen even older partners move in this direction since I started. It feels good to be valued and the environment/culture has improved. The downside is that the pressure on younger attorneys feel is higher, but that is probably an inevitable tradeoff when choosing to start your career at a big firm and simultaneously wanting substantive, high-level experience. The days of having junior associates bill ungodly hours for routine doc review are just gone, which should be no surprise since they were already waning when I started. The days of having junior associates do a bunch of research of questionable value are mostly gone too. My impression is that corp/trans practices have experienced this shift a bit, but not nearly to the extent as litigation practices. It's also probably less relevant at the tip top litigation practices in the country.
HTH.
In any event, I just got an offer from one of those elite lit boutiques. Total base comp is about $30k higher than market, and bonuses have been consistently above market. Otoh I don't need more money nor was I really looking for more money. But it seems like there's a real chance to become partner because the firm has elevated an associate to partner almost every year for the past 5 years (there's only a handful of associates). Also sounds like there's more opportunity for non-partners to take a more live, active role instead of just grinding behind the scenes.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Class of 2014 - Started in Biglaw Still in Biglaw - AMA
How many hours have you generally billed per year over the course of your career? Do you think that has made a different for career longevity?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login