Page 1 of 1

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 4:13 pm
by Anonymous User
DPW is not a major player in cali, I would just consider between Skadden and KE. Given KE offered you 50k, I would just collect that money and lateral out in a few years if you dont like it

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 4:21 pm
by eastcoast_iub
Why would you even think about going to DPW or Skadden if K&E is offering $50k?

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:31 pm
by aibohphobia
Agree with the above poster. The differences between the 3 are not significant enough to even think about turning down 50k at KE. Especially considering KE doesn't have an hours requirement for bonuses so you are guaranteed a full market bonus (likely more) each year. Unless you have a very specific practice you are considering, take the money and run.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 7:37 pm
by Anonymous User
Curious, why is K&E offering the extra money? I'm assuming you're a lateral? K&E SF? What year?

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:18 pm
by Hutz_and_Goodman
Good luck. I would do K+E but these are some brutal firms in terms of QOL.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:12 am
by 2013
Also, assuming the $50k is a diversity fellowship that you get immediately, it’ll help offset your 3L tuition/living costs. Plus, diversity fellows usually get some other perks.

Take Kirkland and don’t look back.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
by Anonymous User
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:47 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.
Agree. I recall the entire original class of 2019 left within a year or so.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:09 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:47 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.
Agree. I recall the entire original class of 2019 left within a year or so.
Woah that's crazy since K&E SF has pretty big summer classes each year if I recall correctly. Was it due to burnout or toxic culture or both?

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:16 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:47 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.
Agree. I recall the entire original class of 2019 left within a year or so.
Can you guys elaborate? Interesting to hear that a bay area office has a reputation.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:30 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:16 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:47 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.
Agree. I recall the entire original class of 2019 left within a year or so.
Can you guys elaborate? Interesting to hear that a bay area office has a reputation.
FYI - there’s a whole bunch of Bay Area offices with reputations (e.g. STB PA). West coast big law might have been more chill 5-10 years ago but is more or less the same as NY now :(

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:15 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:16 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:47 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
If this is Kirkland SF, it has a bit of a reputation, even among Kirkland offices. Just FYI.
Agree. I recall the entire original class of 2019 left within a year or so.
Can you guys elaborate? Interesting to hear that a bay area office has a reputation.
Some Google/TLS searches should yield plentiful results: K&E SF/esp. the private equity practice has had a terrible rep.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:02 pm
by Anonymous User
There’s been some significant partner departures from K&E SF that should help from a QoL perspective….

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:11 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:02 pm
There’s been some significant partner departures from K&E SF that should help from a QoL perspective….

This is an interesting take. I’d be curious to know what period of time you’re referring to for those partner departures.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:06 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:11 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:02 pm
There’s been some significant partner departures from K&E SF that should help from a QoL perspective….

This is an interesting take. I’d be curious to know what period of time you’re referring to for those partner departures.
IIRC a fair amount of partner departures have happened in the past 2 years, mostly to lateral into shares at other firms.

Re: Kirkland ($) v. DPW v. Skadden [bay area]

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 1:23 am
by Anonymous User
@OP, when were you notified of your K&E diversity scholarship offer? I’ve been waiting to hear back on that but was told decisions would not be made until later on this month.