Cooley WFH Rest of 2021 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business- ... ce-in-2021
"Cooley said that it will not institute a mandatory return date or a minimum number of in-office days for those at the firm whose job duties permit remote work."
I'm an incoming Cooley first year associate, and I'm really excited about the flexibility. I see this as a big win for my future mental health
"Cooley said that it will not institute a mandatory return date or a minimum number of in-office days for those at the firm whose job duties permit remote work."
I'm an incoming Cooley first year associate, and I'm really excited about the flexibility. I see this as a big win for my future mental health
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
I'm also an incoming first year and haven't heard about this. Would imagine we get an email in the coming days.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:54 pmhttps://news.bloomberglaw.com/business- ... ce-in-2021
"Cooley said that it will not institute a mandatory return date or a minimum number of in-office days for those at the firm whose job duties permit remote work."
I'm an incoming Cooley first year associate, and I'm really excited about the flexibility. I see this as a big win for my future mental health
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
With WSGR and now Cooley having this policy, other Silicon Valley firms better match
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
Not sure i understand the article. Does that mean remote will continue after 2021
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
Clearly an indication that going forward, we can predict firms' WFH policies based on the type of clients they have. Firms that predominantly service the Morgan Stanleys of the world will make their lawyers come into the office a lot more than firms like Cooley who make their revenue from straight up corporates and startups. Very different pressures and incentives for the two types of firms.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- blair.waldorf
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:52 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
Not sure how Morgan Stanley would even know where their attorneys are working from as long as the firm isn’t advertising permanent remote roles.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 9:16 amClearly an indication that going forward, we can predict firms' WFH policies based on the type of clients they have. Firms that predominantly service the Morgan Stanleys of the world will make their lawyers come into the office a lot more than firms like Cooley who make their revenue from straight up corporates and startups. Very different pressures and incentives for the two types of firms.
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
Ironically, Cooley actually does a lot of ECM work for Morgan Stanley (and other banks that play in the tech/biotech ECM space).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 9:16 amClearly an indication that going forward, we can predict firms' WFH policies based on the type of clients they have. Firms that predominantly service the Morgan Stanleys of the world will make their lawyers come into the office a lot more than firms like Cooley who make their revenue from straight up corporates and startups. Very different pressures and incentives for the two types of firms.
I’m not sure how much client pressure is going to matter at the end of the day, I get that he MS CLO or whoever came out and said what he said, but I doubt that many others in the industry are going to be putting this sort of pressure on…if anything the pandemic has shown lawyers are just as (if not more) productive working from home.
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
My personal wish is for many law firms to tell Morgan Stanley's GC to take his "return to office" demand and shove it because I think it's so annoying for a GC to try to micromanage outside counsel like that. Of course this is a service industry and I understand there are pros and cons of wfh, but if firms are making the decision that they are able to provide quality client service this way, why is this dude telling them they can't?
This makes me kinda irrationally angry, but I don't have experience so I can't tell if this is reasonable. Curious to hear others' thoughts about it?
This makes me kinda irrationally angry, but I don't have experience so I can't tell if this is reasonable. Curious to hear others' thoughts about it?
-
- Posts: 428521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cooley WFH Rest of 2021
I think the banks know the NYC economy in particular is vulnerable if office workers don’t return soon.
Any updates on firms that have announced mandatory return dates?
Any updates on firms that have announced mandatory return dates?