MN Big Law Salary Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Hearing rumors that Dorsey is going to a two tier compensation track. One tier matching the Faegre scale at 1900 billable hours and a lower tier at 1700 hours.
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:51 pmHearing rumors that Dorsey is going to a two tier compensation track. One tier matching the Faegre scale at 1900 billable hours and a lower tier at 1700 hours.
These types of models are not good for associates and never last long. More associates will end up on the 1700 track (yet billing more than that since nobody can just stop billing when they hit their target) and thus save these firms loads of money while enabling them to market that they offer "top pay".
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:51 pmHearing rumors that Dorsey is going to a two tier compensation track. One tier matching the Faegre scale at 1900 billable hours and a lower tier at 1700 hours.
Does Faegre have the same requirement to hit target hours to get full salary?
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
I don’t think so. I believe they are one track with a 1900 hour requirement.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:25 pmAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:51 pmHearing rumors that Dorsey is going to a two tier compensation track. One tier matching the Faegre scale at 1900 billable hours and a lower tier at 1700 hours.
Does Faegre have the same requirement to hit target hours to get full salary?
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Winthrop to 155k
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:36 pmI don’t think so. I believe they are one track with a 1900 hour requirement.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:25 pmAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:51 pmHearing rumors that Dorsey is going to a two tier compensation track. One tier matching the Faegre scale at 1900 billable hours and a lower tier at 1700 hours.
Does Faegre have the same requirement to hit target hours to get full salary?
Didn't Dorsey make $$$$$$ last year and Faegre miss their target? If I was choosing between the two, I would go with Faegre since you can get away with an off or slow year (or two) at most places without taking a salary cut.
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
What was their starting salary before the raise? $140k?
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Not 100% sure but NALP shows 140kAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:56 pmWhat was their starting salary before the raise? $140k?
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Fredrickson to 180k with 1850 billable hours requirement
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Holy shit it’s really happeningAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:58 pmFredrickson to 180k with 1850 billable hours requirement
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
1850 hours is solid. Do they cut your pay or hold back raises if you miss hours?
Anyone know if Faegre does the same thing?
Anyone know if Faegre does the same thing?
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Any news on non-Minneapolis markets? Also what does Fredrikson pay in those markets anyway?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:58 pmFredrickson to 180k with 1850 billable hours requirement
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Heard that Robins is moving and will announce specifics by mid-September
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Winthrop has 180k listed on NALP now
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
NALP has Fox at 155k now
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
Stinson 170k nationwide
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
NALP has Maslon 170k
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
What is Jones Day's Minnesota office like? Also, what's the scoop with Robins Kaplan? What are associates actually billing at these offices? Thanks
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
JD Minneapolis is where careers go to die. Several friends/former colleagues went there and left within a year or two. The partners generate no work so you wind up being overflow for Chicago/NY/DC.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 2:44 pm
What is Jones Day's Minnesota office like? Also, what's the scoop with Robins Kaplan? What are associates actually billing at these offices? Thanks
Sure you make a little more in the short term, but there is no professional development to speak of, and there is no long term sustainability.
Robins has had some big wins lately but they have a funky business model without any transactional work to keep them afloat in lean times. Heavily compressed salary scale for associates, but I think most are 1800-1900 hours , and Minneapolis is pretty low COL so it’s fine.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:59 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
What's up with Maslon? I'm a New York lawyer and I've randomly seen them around a few times (mostly as counsel to US Bank, which I suppose makes sense).
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
I was under the impression that many of the people who left Jones Day Minneapolis recently jumped into nice in-house roles—were they pushed out instead?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 4:45 pmJD Minneapolis is where careers go to die. Several friends/former colleagues went there and left within a year or two. The partners generate no work so you wind up being overflow for Chicago/NY/DC.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 2:44 pm
What is Jones Day's Minnesota office like? Also, what's the scoop with Robins Kaplan? What are associates actually billing at these offices? Thanks
Sure you make a little more in the short term, but there is no professional development to speak of, and there is no long term sustainability.
Robins has had some big wins lately but they have a funky business model without any transactional work to keep them afloat in lean times. Heavily compressed salary scale for associates, but I think most are 1800-1900 hours , and Minneapolis is pretty low COL so it’s fine.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
I'll start with caveat that my info is slightly dated. I was at JD Minneapolis as an associate during the pandemic. Ultimately, I left because of the scenario described above. While it's an exaggeration that partners don't generate work, a lot of the work I did came out of other offices. When I left, I felt very stagnant, like I had not learned any new skills for years. It's not like that for all people, it just depends on what matters you get stuck with. I knew associates who worked on matters that allowed them to learn and grow as an attorney.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:25 pmI was under the impression that many of the people who left Jones Day Minneapolis recently jumped into nice in-house roles—were they pushed out instead?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 4:45 pmJD Minneapolis is where careers go to die. Several friends/former colleagues went there and left within a year or two. The partners generate no work so you wind up being overflow for Chicago/NY/DC.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 2:44 pm
What is Jones Day's Minnesota office like? Also, what's the scoop with Robins Kaplan? What are associates actually billing at these offices? Thanks
Sure you make a little more in the short term, but there is no professional development to speak of, and there is no long term sustainability.
Robins has had some big wins lately but they have a funky business model without any transactional work to keep them afloat in lean times. Heavily compressed salary scale for associates, but I think most are 1800-1900 hours , and Minneapolis is pretty low COL so it’s fine.
But to answer your question directly, people got their pay docked during the pandemic and those people knew they were basically being asked to leave. In 2020 pay was frozen and we were told only super performers even got raises. They did not say they decreased people's pay, but that's what happened. Many of the associates that I knew who left went to other firms or in-house, but even the in-house people were the ones that got docked and we're being pushed out. I would t be surprised if recent departures to in-house were due to being pushed out, but I wouldn't know if that were the case.
-
- Posts: 428467
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MN Big Law Salary
My perception of JD is the same as others have said. It’s not a place where the average associate has a chance to grow and develop the same as the firms that have more homegrown business. And because many associates are servicing overflow from other offices, you actually don’t get the same opportunity to build a local network and client relationships that can help you land the best in-house positions in MN, if that is your goal.
That’s a generalization and any particular person’s experience may vary. They did promote three Minneapolis associates to partner over the last two years (including a former SCOTUS clerk), with JD class years of 2010-2014, so some people eventually find some long term success there.
That’s a generalization and any particular person’s experience may vary. They did promote three Minneapolis associates to partner over the last two years (including a former SCOTUS clerk), with JD class years of 2010-2014, so some people eventually find some long term success there.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login