2021 Am Law 100
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:38 am
Can a good Samaritan please post the list for the rest of us to dissect?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=309669
What do you mean by ranking? It looks like all ranking is in line with their total revenue numbers. Are you saying only the revenue numbers are new? It doesnt look like it to me.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
Sorry ignore me, just found the list. I'll compile the rankings right now and post themAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
Muchas graciasAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:08 pmSorry ignore me, just found the list. I'll compile the rankings right now and post themAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
Should be able to see it hereAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:11 pmMuchas graciasAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:08 pmSorry ignore me, just found the list. I'll compile the rankings right now and post themAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
Firm Name PPEP Rank RPL Rank Gross Revenue RankAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:19 pmShould be able to see it hereAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:11 pmMuchas graciasAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:08 pmSorry ignore me, just found the list. I'll compile the rankings right now and post themAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
Thank you!!!Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:19 pmShould be able to see it hereAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:11 pmMuchas graciasAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:08 pmSorry ignore me, just found the list. I'll compile the rankings right now and post themAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:04 pmSorry, meant to say rankings look updated but $$$ figures aren't
WLKR's profits per lawyer are still completely absurd. More than 2x #2. I'd venture to guess their profit margins are tops by a similar margin (although AmLaw hasn't posted that info as far as I can see).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 1:42 pmOne longer term trend that jumps out on PPP is the shrinking gap between #1 and the rest. In 2010, WLRK's PPP was 2X DPW and 1.5X CSM, S&C, etc. In 2020, WLRK's PPP was +18% over DPW and +21% K&E. (Ofc, WLRK manages to hit those numbers with way less leverage.)
DPW is eye popping, but some other firms have larger nonequity tiers than they did 10 years ago. So that explains why they’ve “caught up.”Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 1:42 pmOne longer term trend that jumps out on PPP is the shrinking gap between #1 and the rest. In 2010, WLRK's PPP was 2X DPW and 1.5X CSM, S&C, etc. In 2020, WLRK's PPP was +18% over DPW and +21% K&E. (Ofc, WLRK manages to hit those numbers with way less leverage.)
They have. WLRK 67%, Cahill 66%, Gibson Dunn 63%, Kirkland 61%, Milbank 59%, Wilkie 57%, Davis Polk, Quinn, and Sullivan and Cromwell at 56%, PW, Simpson and Latham at 55%. cravath about 5 more spots down at 50%. It’s on the same page as the PPEP page, you just have to click the next arrow at the bottom of the chart.hoos89 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 1:57 pmWLKR's profits per lawyer are still completely absurd. More than 2x #2. I'd venture to guess their profit margins are tops by a similar margin (although AmLaw hasn't posted that info as far as I can see).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 1:42 pmOne longer term trend that jumps out on PPP is the shrinking gap between #1 and the rest. In 2010, WLRK's PPP was 2X DPW and 1.5X CSM, S&C, etc. In 2020, WLRK's PPP was +18% over DPW and +21% K&E. (Ofc, WLRK manages to hit those numbers with way less leverage.)
Leverage. DPW is 5.27 associates per equity partner. Kirkland is 4.72. S&C is 3.81. Less partners sharing profits = more profits per partner.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:04 pmCan someone explain the math behind how both DPW and Kirkland have about $1M higher PPP than S&C, but their RPL is still behind S&C's?
Yeah..that’s what I thought. But what I can’t understand is how S&C can operate with much smaller number of associates per equity partner than that of DPW and Kirkland. Is it too simplistic to say this just means S&C associates are getting killed?cheaptilts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:10 pmLeverage. DPW is 5.27 associates per equity partner. Kirkland is 4.72. S&C is 3.81. Less partners sharing profits = more profits per partner.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:04 pmCan someone explain the math behind how both DPW and Kirkland have about $1M higher PPP than S&C, but their RPL is still behind S&C's?
I heard that S&C's billing rates are slightly higherAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:31 pmYeah..that’s what I thought. But what I can’t understand is how S&C can operate with much smaller number of associates per equity partner than that of DPW and Kirkland. Is it too simplistic to say this just means S&C associates are getting killed?cheaptilts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:10 pmLeverage. DPW is 5.27 associates per equity partner. Kirkland is 4.72. S&C is 3.81. Less partners sharing profits = more profits per partner.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:04 pmCan someone explain the math behind how both DPW and Kirkland have about $1M higher PPP than S&C, but their RPL is still behind S&C's?
Very true, http://cyansecuritieslitigation.com/med ... _court.pdf page 51 has firms' average billing rates.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:37 pmI heard that S&C's billing rates are slightly higherAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:31 pmYeah..that’s what I thought. But what I can’t understand is how S&C can operate with much smaller number of associates per equity partner than that of DPW and Kirkland. Is it too simplistic to say this just means S&C associates are getting killed?cheaptilts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:10 pmLeverage. DPW is 5.27 associates per equity partner. Kirkland is 4.72. S&C is 3.81. Less partners sharing profits = more profits per partner.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:04 pmCan someone explain the math behind how both DPW and Kirkland have about $1M higher PPP than S&C, but their RPL is still behind S&C's?
I think Wachtell--and firms like Boies (RIP)--appear so low because a lot of their revenue doesn't come from billables but instead from alternative fee arrangements (contingency fees, taking a percentage of the value of the deal, etc.). Hourly rate is imperfect, but a good metric to consider nonethelessAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:56 pmDavis at $6.3mm PPEP with #17 billing rate? Please send their associates help
Wait Wachtel is #15? This list is off