Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Notwithstanding the tracking stuff, would appreciate any insights into personalities in DPW CM/FIG/corporate generally.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 amIs Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hoursAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pmAnyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threadsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 amI heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 amRobbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Wait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internallyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pmA lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 amIs Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hoursAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pmAnyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threadsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 amI heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 amRobbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Wilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pmWait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internallyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pmA lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 amIs Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hoursAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pmAnyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threadsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 amI heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 amRobbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pmThis thread has incredible potential.
Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.
Andriana Georgallas at Weil is awful to work for. Avoid at all costs.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Partner/Owner would disappear to for days on end. It got so bad his wife would call me asking if I knew his whereabouts. I usually wouldn't. I would try to check in on him and he would ignore my calls/texts, too. I always felt she thought I was covering up for him and he felt I was trying to supply her information.
Getting in the middle of your bosses marital problems is not fun.
Getting in the middle of your bosses marital problems is not fun.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
LMAO this is a good oneAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:16 amAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pmThis thread has incredible potential.
Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.
Andriana Georgallas at Weil is awful to work for. Avoid at all costs.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Anyone have anything on Shearman?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Most of the tyrants outed in this thread seem to be RX partners. Is that self selection or the nature of the practice? I have never worked with them, but the bankruptcy folks at my firm seem very pleasant.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
I specifically asked about RX partners upthread.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:49 pmMost of the tyrants outed in this thread seem to be RX partners. Is that self selection or the nature of the practice? I have never worked with them, but the bankruptcy folks at my firm seem very pleasant.
I also don't think "most" is accurate.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Why are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pmSTB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Anyone especially awful to avoid at PW M&A (aside from Barshay)?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Does this definitely mean the associates work less? Or is it kinda like when firms have no hours requirements for bonuses but some people end up working more as a result of having no target to stop atAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:55 amWilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pmWait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internallyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pmA lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 amIs Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hoursAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pmAnyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threadsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 amI heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 amRobbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
SecondedAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:28 pmNotwithstanding the tracking stuff, would appreciate any insights into personalities in DPW CM/FIG/corporate generally.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
any insight re Latham NY? anyone to avoid?
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:09 pm
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Could you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pmWhy are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pmSTB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:55 pm
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Same here. Incoming STB SA—was pretty set on M&A and never heard anything like this about the group from any of the people I've spoken to.SummerAssociate1689 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:12 pmCould you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pmWhy are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pmSTB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Any insight on Atlanta firms?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
It definitely does *not* mean that they work less. Friends who have worked there (some have left) worked constantly. Believe it or not, tracking hours can be a good thing. Without them, how do you have any sense of when to stop? If Beth wants you to do more, you're doing more . . . .Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:36 pmDoes this definitely mean the associates work less? Or is it kinda like when firms have no hours requirements for bonuses but some people end up working more as a result of having no target to stop atAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:55 amWilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pmWait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internallyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pmA lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 amIs Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hoursAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pmAnyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threadsAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am
I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
The banking group generally, not because they're bad people, but because it's the most toxic culture you could imagine. They just absolutely burn through people.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
What makes it a toxic culture, if not composed of bad people?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:16 pmThe banking group generally, not because they're bad people, but because it's the most toxic culture you could imagine. They just absolutely burn through people.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Having been across from Andy Dietderich at S&C, he's also a dumbass lol. And that simpering voice. The worst voice in the world; just dripping bullshit. I constantly wanted to slap him.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:19 pmGarrett Fail at WeilAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pmThis thread has incredible potential.
Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.
Andy Dietderich at S&C
Tom Lauria at White and Case
Everyone at Akin
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Any insight into MB? Lateraling there soon.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Recruiting sure did their job well... STB M&A is widely known as being one of the worst groups amongst big law firms.ColdBreadstick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:33 pmSame here. Incoming STB SA—was pretty set on M&A and never heard anything like this about the group from any of the people I've spoken to.SummerAssociate1689 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:12 pmCould you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pmWhy are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pmSTB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?
Any insight on Debevoise?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login