Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:28 pm

Notwithstanding the tracking stuff, would appreciate any insights into personalities in DPW CM/FIG/corporate generally.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 am
Robbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
Anyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threads
Is Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hours
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 am
Robbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
Anyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threads
Is Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hours
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.
Wait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internally

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:55 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 am
Robbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
Anyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threads
Is Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hours
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.
Wait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internally
Wilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:16 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pm
This thread has incredible potential.

Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.

Andriana Georgallas at Weil is awful to work for. Avoid at all costs.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:48 am

Partner/Owner would disappear to for days on end. It got so bad his wife would call me asking if I knew his whereabouts. I usually wouldn't. I would try to check in on him and he would ignore my calls/texts, too. I always felt she thought I was covering up for him and he felt I was trying to supply her information.

Getting in the middle of your bosses marital problems is not fun.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 12:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:16 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pm
This thread has incredible potential.

Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.

Andriana Georgallas at Weil is awful to work for. Avoid at all costs.
LMAO this is a good one

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:28 pm

Anyone have anything on Shearman?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:49 pm

Most of the tyrants outed in this thread seem to be RX partners. Is that self selection or the nature of the practice? I have never worked with them, but the bankruptcy folks at my firm seem very pleasant.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:49 pm
Most of the tyrants outed in this thread seem to be RX partners. Is that self selection or the nature of the practice? I have never worked with them, but the bankruptcy folks at my firm seem very pleasant.
I specifically asked about RX partners upthread.

I also don't think "most" is accurate.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pm
STB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
Why are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:25 pm

Anyone especially awful to avoid at PW M&A (aside from Barshay)?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:55 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:28 am
Robbie Kaplan (of Kaplan Hecker) is very tough to work with (or, more accurately, for). She's well connected and brings in amazing cases, but they take a toll on associates. Like, a physically grueling toll slash heartburn. In retrospect, not worth it.
I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
Anyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threads
Is Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hours
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.
Wait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internally
Wilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.
Does this definitely mean the associates work less? Or is it kinda like when firms have no hours requirements for bonuses but some people end up working more as a result of having no target to stop at

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:28 pm
Notwithstanding the tracking stuff, would appreciate any insights into personalities in DPW CM/FIG/corporate generally.
Seconded

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:57 pm

any insight re Latham NY? anyone to avoid?

SummerAssociate1689

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:09 pm

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by SummerAssociate1689 » Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pm
STB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
Why are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.
Could you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?

ColdBreadstick

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:55 pm

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by ColdBreadstick » Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:33 pm

SummerAssociate1689 wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pm
STB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
Why are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.
Could you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?
Same here. Incoming STB SA—was pretty set on M&A and never heard anything like this about the group from any of the people I've spoken to.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:12 pm

Any insight on Atlanta firms?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:48 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:36 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:55 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:24 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:58 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:59 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:57 am


I heard this too, but I have no first hand experience. I am also nowhere near her professional or social circle, so this reputation must be really widespread. Is this still true? Again, why are people flocking to her boutique and is the culture of her boutique bad, because of this?
Anyone have any other insights on the top litigation boutiques? I know Kellogg, Susman, and Wilkinson are supposed to be meat grinders but associates on here seem to love working at Susman from other threads
Is Wilkinson a meat grinder? I’ve heard quite the opposite. Among other things, they don’t bill hours
A lot of the top lit boutiques, plus Wachtell, don’t bill hours but that doesn’t mean you don’t work hard. I don’t know anything firsthand but on this forum you’ll find a good amount of talk about brutal hours there.
Wait, I'm confused—what do you mean they don't bill hours? Maybe clients don't pay based on an hourly fee arrangement (contingency, etc.) but all lawyers still input their hours and the firms keep track of hours internally
Wilkinson doesn't even bill hours internally. A lot of other firms that don't bill clients hourly might do so, but Wilkinson definitely doesn't.
Does this definitely mean the associates work less? Or is it kinda like when firms have no hours requirements for bonuses but some people end up working more as a result of having no target to stop at
It definitely does *not* mean that they work less. Friends who have worked there (some have left) worked constantly. Believe it or not, tracking hours can be a good thing. Without them, how do you have any sense of when to stop? If Beth wants you to do more, you're doing more . . . .

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:16 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:57 pm
any insight re Latham NY? anyone to avoid?
The banking group generally, not because they're bad people, but because it's the most toxic culture you could imagine. They just absolutely burn through people.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:16 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:57 pm
any insight re Latham NY? anyone to avoid?
The banking group generally, not because they're bad people, but because it's the most toxic culture you could imagine. They just absolutely burn through people.
What makes it a toxic culture, if not composed of bad people?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:30 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:19 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:48 pm
This thread has incredible potential.

Any partners in the NY bankruptcy scene with a reputation? Or bankruptcy/RX generally. Would like to have a heads up as an incoming RX associate.
Garrett Fail at Weil
Andy Dietderich at S&C
Tom Lauria at White and Case
Everyone at Akin
Having been across from Andy Dietderich at S&C, he's also a dumbass lol. And that simpering voice. The worst voice in the world; just dripping bullshit. I constantly wanted to slap him.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:01 am

Any insight into MB? Lateraling there soon.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:59 am

ColdBreadstick wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:33 pm
SummerAssociate1689 wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:12 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:52 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:10 pm
STB m&a - Sebastián tiller, Ben Schaye, Mike holick, marni Lerner, William Allen. The culture and group is generally horrific.
Why are people letting Caroline Gottschalk and Brian Stadler off so easy? There are some people who are good to work for in M&A (realistic with time, interested in teaching) - mainly doing strategic M&A rather than PE - but in general I agree with the post above. If working for "nice" (but no less demanding) people is your bag, stick to the credit group.
Could you PM me? Would love to hear more about the culture of STB's M&A group. Isn't STB centralized staffing so you don't rly get to control who you get?
Same here. Incoming STB SA—was pretty set on M&A and never heard anything like this about the group from any of the people I've spoken to.
Recruiting sure did their job well... STB M&A is widely known as being one of the worst groups amongst big law firms.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428535
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Which partners at your firms are notoriously terrible to work for?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:55 am

Any insight on Debevoise?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”