Best and worst firm websites Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Thu May 06, 2021 9:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu May 06, 2021 9:21 pm
I love the Kramer Levin and Alston & Bird websites.

Cravath finally updating their website was a great idea.

White & Case's website is a bit gauche since they're obviously trying too hard.

Kasowitz would be gauche, too, if it didn't seem like they were going for a DUI defense firm vibe on purpose.
I actually liked the white case one, I just think it looks international for some reason and really fits their vibe

Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Thu May 06, 2021 11:21 pm

Shearman's bios are arguably the worst. That was something I never liked when I was there. The backgound and the photos don't mesh well, and the positioning of the photos at the bottom is ugly too.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Mon May 10, 2021 5:31 pm

Honestly, I would prefer a no-frills website that's easy to navigate over a visually impressive one that's convoluted to navigate and all the animations and effects slow things down. Paul Weiss's website goes into that former category for me. But there are prestigious firms with websites that are neither pretty nor easy to navigate, which just baffle me...

Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:20 pm

Opinions on the new DPW website?

Is the new “market” position that stock photography is passé?

ExpOriental

Bronze
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 2:36 pm

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by ExpOriental » Sat Jun 12, 2021 3:05 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:20 pm
Opinions on the new DPW website?

Is the new “market” position that stock photography is passé?
It's very good, on the short list for best functionality based on my short perusal. The design is perfectly fine; it's very spare, which is probably ideal. It's not very original, which again is probably for the best.

The layout of profile pages is a bit busy.

The biggest offense is definitely the color scheme. The intensely saturated background + B&W pictures makes everyone look like they have blue-tinted skin. And it's overall just fatiguing on the eyes. They should probably desaturate it a bit, and possibly switch to color profile pictures.

It's a vast improvement, though, and I'm mostly nitpicking.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 12, 2021 6:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:20 pm
Opinions on the new DPW website?

Is the new “market” position that stock photography is passé?
Bloomberg blue.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:22 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:20 pm
Opinions on the new DPW website?

Is the new “market” position that stock photography is passé?
Can't stand the color scheme

Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:39 pm

since dpw has updated their website there is only one weird/outdated-looking website left in the v10s now

*looking at Latham*

ExpOriental

Bronze
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 2:36 pm

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by ExpOriental » Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Feb 10, 2021 2:36 pm
Regarding all the comments nominating Latham, their letters might as well start on the second page. Their letterhead lists their offices vertically.

(Anon because I'm probably the most vocal person annoyed by this, and it will instantly out me to many people.)
Bumping this out of curiosity on a related point:

Does Paul Comma Weiss still list the entire partnership on the letterhead for formal comms? I remember thinking that was one of the goofiest, most archaic things I've ever seen.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428468
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Best and worst firm websites

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:51 pm

Cravath and Williams & Connolly still do, which makes me think it wouldn’t be all that strange for PW to do so as well.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”