STB v Latham v Debevoise for NY corporate
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 6:03 pm
I am generally interested in corporate work, not banking though, but not sure which firm to pick. The advice so far that I've gotten is that every NY firm is a sweatshop so just pick whichever people you liked the best, but I feel like that ignores a lot of relevant factors. While these are all good options, it seems hard to actually distinguish between them, especially over Zoom. I am primarily concerned with: stable-ish hours (ideally not constant fire drills), getting to try different practice areas, culture/what the people are like, diversity considerations (I am a woman), exit options, associate dynamic with partners, and prestige outside of NY in the event I want to move markets. I really don't care about making partner or prestige for the sake of prestige. All of the firms fully paid their summer associates and did COVID special bonuses.
Simpson Thacher
pros:
pros:
pros:
Simpson Thacher
pros:
- nice-ish but seem kind of awkward
modified lockstep and centralized staffing
stronger for M&A/PE
prestige outside of NY
no billable hours
- rotation system
less social
the partners I've met seem very intense
deferred first year associates until January
pros:
- culture? (they seem nicest)
fully lockstep and centralized staffing
diverse corp work but also good at M&A/PE
NYC focused
no billable hours
- rotation system
NYC/international focus
less social
new Hudson Yards office - harder to get to via public transit
pros:
- social culture (but also bro-y???)
unassigned system
associates committees (transparency and less hierarchical)
prestige outside of NY
new midtown office
emerging companies practice
- unassigned system (can be bad for women)
1900 billable requirement
semi black box bonuses (can be bad for women)