How is Paul Weiss's corporate group (NYC)?
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:54 pm
I know Paul, Weiss is primarily known for lit, but hows their corporate group (say in comparison to Cleary/Weil)?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=308669
Scott Barshay doesn't demean associates, and looks out for their time? News to me. Has he turned over a new leaf recently?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:20 pmAnon because don't want to get traced. I know a couple 2nd/3rd year associates and partners who love working in PW corporate, have plenty of work, and get interesting deals. Especially with SB on the M&A side but also PW's pretty strong Private Equity connections. Every firm (DPW, KE, S&C, Cravath) all come to mind as having a few corporate partners notoriously difficult to work for. PW doesn't really tolerate partners demeaning associates or as crushing workloads. However, the nature of growing a corporate practice means there will be a heavier workload but that's being accounted for with new hiring. Quickly looking through recent deals and clients, PWs look as good as anywhere else.
I never worked with Barshay but I’ve heard a lot about him at Cravath from those who have. From what I’ve heard, associates were very happy that he left and he is just as much of a dick as his reputation suggests.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 9:14 pmScott Barshay doesn't demean associates, and looks out for their time? News to me. Has he turned over a new leaf recently?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:20 pmAnon because don't want to get traced. I know a couple 2nd/3rd year associates and partners who love working in PW corporate, have plenty of work, and get interesting deals. Especially with SB on the M&A side but also PW's pretty strong Private Equity connections. Every firm (DPW, KE, S&C, Cravath) all come to mind as having a few corporate partners notoriously difficult to work for. PW doesn't really tolerate partners demeaning associates or as crushing workloads. However, the nature of growing a corporate practice means there will be a heavier workload but that's being accounted for with new hiring. Quickly looking through recent deals and clients, PWs look as good as anywhere else.
Genuine question: Is this something that offerees should seriously consider? I.e., do junior/mid-level associates actually interact with Barshay? Or is Barshay's personality indicative of PW's corporate group culture as a whole? I heard there were some partners that are collegial to work with, although I would appreciate insight from a larger sample size.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 10:53 amI never worked with Barshay but I’ve heard a lot about him at Cravath from those who have. From what I’ve heard, associates were very happy that he left and he is just as much of a dick as his reputation suggests.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 9:14 pmScott Barshay doesn't demean associates, and looks out for their time? News to me. Has he turned over a new leaf recently?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:20 pmAnon because don't want to get traced. I know a couple 2nd/3rd year associates and partners who love working in PW corporate, have plenty of work, and get interesting deals. Especially with SB on the M&A side but also PW's pretty strong Private Equity connections. Every firm (DPW, KE, S&C, Cravath) all come to mind as having a few corporate partners notoriously difficult to work for. PW doesn't really tolerate partners demeaning associates or as crushing workloads. However, the nature of growing a corporate practice means there will be a heavier workload but that's being accounted for with new hiring. Quickly looking through recent deals and clients, PWs look as good as anywhere else.
Mid-level and junior level associates don't interact with him that much, if at all. I doubt even senior associates get to work with him that much, bc associates usually work with more junior partners than actually directly with BarshayAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:27 amGenuine question: Is this something that offerees should seriously consider? I.e., do junior/mid-level associates actually interact with Barshay? Or is Barshay's personality indicative of PW's corporate group culture as a whole? I heard there were some partners that are collegial to work with, although I would appreciate insight from a larger sample size.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 10:53 amI never worked with Barshay but I’ve heard a lot about him at Cravath from those who have. From what I’ve heard, associates were very happy that he left and he is just as much of a dick as his reputation suggests.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 9:14 pmScott Barshay doesn't demean associates, and looks out for their time? News to me. Has he turned over a new leaf recently?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:20 pmAnon because don't want to get traced. I know a couple 2nd/3rd year associates and partners who love working in PW corporate, have plenty of work, and get interesting deals. Especially with SB on the M&A side but also PW's pretty strong Private Equity connections. Every firm (DPW, KE, S&C, Cravath) all come to mind as having a few corporate partners notoriously difficult to work for. PW doesn't really tolerate partners demeaning associates or as crushing workloads. However, the nature of growing a corporate practice means there will be a heavier workload but that's being accounted for with new hiring. Quickly looking through recent deals and clients, PWs look as good as anywhere else.